Bug#793418: plasma-nm menu very tiny
Package: plasma-nm
Version: 4:5.3.2-1
Followup-For: Bug #793418
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256
I have now found that this only happens when connecting an external
monitor. Using only my notebook's internal display, the menu is rendered
as expected.
- -- System Information:
Debian Release: stretch/sid
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Foreign Architectures: i386
Kernel: Linux 4.0.0-2-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=de_DE.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=de_DE.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/lksh
Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system)
Versions of packages plasma-nm depends on:
ii libc6 2.19-19
ii libkf5completion5 5.12.0-1
ii libkf5configcore5 5.12.0-1
ii libkf5configwidgets5 5.12.0-1
ii libkf5coreaddons5 5.12.0-1
ii libkf5dbusaddons5 5.12.0-1
ii libkf5i18n5 5.12.0-1
ii libkf5iconthemes5 5.12.0-1
ii libkf5itemviews5 5.12.0-1
ii libkf5kdelibs4support5 5.12.0-2
ii libkf5kiowidgets5 5.12.0-1
ii libkf5modemmanagerqt6 5.12.0-1
ii libkf5networkmanagerqt6 5.12.0-1
ii libkf5notifications5 5.12.0-1
ii libkf5service5 5.12.0-1
ii libkf5solid5 5.12.0-1
ii libkf5wallet5 5.12.0-1
ii libkf5widgetsaddons5 5.12.0-1
ii libkf5windowsystem5 5.12.0-1
ii libkf5xmlgui5 5.12.0-1
ii libopenconnect5 7.06-2
ii libqt5core5a 5.4.2+dfsg-5
ii libqt5dbus5 5.4.2+dfsg-5
ii libqt5gui5 5.4.2+dfsg-5
ii libqt5network5 5.4.2+dfsg-5
ii libqt5qml5 5.4.2-4
ii libqt5widgets5 5.4.2+dfsg-5
ii libqt5xml5 5.4.2+dfsg-5
ii libstdc++6 5.1.1-14
ii mobile-broadband-provider-info 20140317-1
ii network-manager 1.0.2-2
plasma-nm recommends no packages.
Versions of packages plasma-nm suggests:
pn network-manager-openconnect <none>
ii network-manager-openvpn 1.0.2-1
ii network-manager-pptp 1.0.2-1
ii network-manager-vpnc 1.0.2-1
- -- no debconf information
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1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=rCMK
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: