[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#793618: baloo: fails to upgrade from jessie - apt does not find an upgrade path



On Saturday, July 25, 2015 05:37:06 PM you wrote:
> Package: baloo
> Version: 4:5.9.2-3
> Severity: serious
> User: debian-qa@lists.debian.org
> Usertags: piuparts
> 
> Hi,
> 
> during a test with piuparts I noticed your package fails to upgrade from
> 'jessie'.
> It installed fine in 'jessie', then the upgrade to 'stretch' fails
> because apt did not find an upgrade path.
> 
> >>From the attached log (scroll to the bottom...):
> 1m43.7s DEBUG: Starting command: ['chroot', '/tmp/piupartss/tmpHo82BY',
> 'apt-get', '-yf', 'dist-upgrade'] 4m18.7s DUMP:
>   Reading package lists...
>   Building dependency tree...
>   Reading state information...
>   Starting pkgProblemResolver with broken count: 2
>   Settings used to calculate pkgProblemResolver::Scores::
> [...]
>   1 baloo-utils [ amd64 ] < 4:4.14.2-1 -> 4:4.14.2-1.1 > ( kde )
>   -1 baloo-kf5-data [ amd64 ] < none > ( none )
>   -1 baloo-kf5 [ amd64 ] < none -> 5.9.2-3 > ( utils )
>   -1 baloo [ amd64 ] < 4:4.14.2-1 -> 4:5.9.2-3 > ( oldlibs )
> [...]
>   Starting 2 pkgProblemResolver with broken count: 2
>   Investigating (0) libgnutls-deb0-28 [ amd64 ] < 3.3.8-6+deb8u1 -> 3.3.16-1
> > ( libs ) Broken libgnutls-deb0-28:amd64 Conflicts on libhogweed2 [ amd64
> ] < 2.7.1-5 > ( libs ) Considering libhogweed2:amd64 -3 as a solution to
> libgnutls-deb0-28:amd64 18 Added libhogweed2:amd64 to the remove list
>   Broken libgnutls-deb0-28:amd64 Conflicts on libnettle4 [ amd64 ] < 2.7.1-5
> > ( libs ) Considering libnettle4:amd64 -2 as a solution to
> libgnutls-deb0-28:amd64 18 Added libnettle4:amd64 to the remove list
>     Fixing libgnutls-deb0-28:amd64 via remove of libhogweed2:amd64
>     Fixing libgnutls-deb0-28:amd64 via remove of libnettle4:amd64
>   Investigating (0) baloo4 [ amd64 ] < 4:4.14.2-1 -> 4:4.14.2-1.1 > ( kde )
>   Broken baloo4:amd64 Conflicts on baloo-kf5 [ amd64 ] < none -> 5.9.2-3 > (
> utils ) Considering baloo-kf5:amd64 -1 as a solution to baloo4:amd64 0
> Added baloo-kf5:amd64 to the remove list
>     Fixing baloo4:amd64 via keep of baloo-kf5:amd64
>   Investigating (0) baloo [ amd64 ] < 4:4.14.2-1 -> 4:5.9.2-3 > ( oldlibs )
>   Broken baloo:amd64 Depends on baloo-kf5 [ amd64 ] < none -> 5.9.2-3 > (
> utils ) (>= 5.9.2) Considering baloo-kf5:amd64 -1 as a solution to
> baloo:amd64 -1 Holding Back baloo:amd64 rather than change baloo-kf5:amd64
>    Try to Re-Instate (1) baloo:amd64
>   Done
> [...]
>   The following packages will be REMOVED:
>     libhogweed2 libnettle4
>   The following NEW packages will be installed:
> 
>   The following packages have been kept back:
>     baloo
>   The following packages will be upgraded:
> [...]
>   138 upgraded, 38 newly installed, 2 to remove and 1 not upgraded.
> 
> 
> Hmm, why is baloo4 still in testing (or unstable)?
> Getting src:baloo removed from the archive should probably fix this.
> 
> Let's see what would happen:
> 
> anbe@coccia:~$ dak rm -Rn baloo
> Will remove the following packages from unstable:
> 
>      baloo | 4:4.14.2-1.1 | source
>  baloo-dbg | 4:4.14.2-1.1 | amd64, arm64, armel, armhf, hurd-i386, i386,
> kfreebsd-amd64, kfreebsd-i386, mips, mipsel, powerpc, ppc64el, s390x, sparc
> baloo-dev | 4:4.14.2-1.1 | amd64, arm64, armel, armhf, hurd-i386, i386,
> kfreebsd-amd64, kfreebsd-i386, mips, mipsel, powerpc, ppc64el, s390x, sparc
> baloo-utils | 4:4.14.2-1.1 | amd64, arm64, armel, armhf, hurd-i386, i386,
> kfreebsd-amd64, kfreebsd-i386, mips, mipsel, powerpc, ppc64el, s390x, sparc
> baloo4 | 4:4.14.2-1.1 | amd64, arm64, armel, armhf, hurd-i386, i386,
> kfreebsd-amd64, kfreebsd-i386, mips, mipsel, powerpc, ppc64el, s390x, sparc
> libbaloocore4 | 4:4.14.2-1.1 | amd64, arm64, armel, armhf, hurd-i386, i386,
> kfreebsd-amd64, kfreebsd-i386, mips, mipsel, powerpc, ppc64el, s390x, sparc
> libbaloofiles4 | 4:4.14.2-1.1 | amd64, arm64, armel, armhf, hurd-i386,
> i386, kfreebsd-amd64, kfreebsd-i386, mips, mipsel, powerpc, ppc64el, s390x,
> sparc libbaloopim4 | 4:4.14.2-1.1 | amd64, arm64, armel, armhf, hurd-i386,
> i386, kfreebsd-amd64, kfreebsd-i386, mips, mipsel, powerpc, ppc64el, s390x,
> sparc libbalooqueryparser4 | 4:4.14.2-1.1 | amd64, arm64, armel, armhf,
> hurd-i386, i386, kfreebsd-amd64, kfreebsd-i386, mips, mipsel, powerpc,
> ppc64el, s390x, sparc libbalooxapian4 | 4:4.14.2-1.1 | amd64, arm64, armel,
> armhf, hurd-i386, i386, kfreebsd-amd64, kfreebsd-i386, mips, mipsel,
> powerpc, ppc64el, s390x, sparc
> 
> Maintainer: Debian/Ubuntu Qt/KDE Maintainers
> <debian-qt-kde@lists.debian.org>
> 
> ------------------- Reason -------------------
> 
> ----------------------------------------------
> 
> Checking reverse dependencies...
> # Broken Depends:
> baloo-widgets: libbaloowidgets4
> digikam: digikam-private-libs [amd64 arm64 armel armhf i386 kfreebsd-amd64
> kfreebsd-i386 mips mipsel powerpc ppc64el s390x sparc] gwenview: gwenview
> kde-baseapps: dolphin
> kdepim: knotes
>         libkdepim4
>         libmessagelist4
> nepomuk-core: nepomuk-core-runtime
> 
> # Broken Build-Depends:
> baloo-kcmadv: baloo-dev
> baloo-widgets: baloo-dev
> digikam: baloo-dev
> gwenview: baloo-dev (>= 4.13)
> kde-baseapps: baloo-dev
> kdepim: baloo-dev (>= 4:4.13)
>         baloo-dev (>= 4:4.14)
> nepomuk-core: baloo-dev (>= 4:4.13.0)
> 
> Dependency problem found.
> 
> 
> Looks like you need a baloo-dev transition ...

Not all these have Kf5 versions available yet, but getting this done after the 
gcc5 transition for those that do will be a priority.

Scott K

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.


Reply to: