On mar., 2015-03-10 at 10:02 +0000, Simon McVittie wrote: > > slim and lightdm do have native systemd .service files, but don't have > > those relationships, which I think is probably a bug in those DMs' > > service files > > If they do not interact with plymouth themselves like gdm does, then it > is correct to not have this relationship. Actually lightdm tries to interact with plymouth (http://sources.debian.net/src/lightdm/1.10.3-3/src/plymouth.c/) > > lightdm does not appear to have this bug, so I will drop it from Cc in > future responses: when I installed both gdm3 and lightdm, everything > seemed to work fine. Ok, fine for me :) Regards, -- Yves-Alexis
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part