Bug#752209: About calligra icc profiles packaging.
Hi:
El Jueves, 10 de julio de 2014 20:28:59 Bastien ROUCARIES escribió:
> On Tue, Jul 8, 2014 at 11:58 PM, Raúl Sánchez <rasasi78@gmail.com> wrote:
> > [...]
> >
> > So I think we can consider this file as Public Domain. As you say, it is
> > not licensed under the same terms as the rest of the package but I
> > don't think this make the whole package fails to comply with the Debian
> > policy.
>
> Do you have proof of it? Copyright file say it is copyrighted.
> Moreover you must agree before download it.
I hope we can trust what a file says about his own copyright. You know public
domain as copyright statement is paradoxical, still I'd take this file as
public domain.
What I don't understand is that I must agree before download it. What should
be agreed? I get the file from the calligra source tarball.
>
> > Anyway, copyright file may be adjusted and maybe we should add and
> > support dependency on icc-profiles* packages.
>
> If you do this your package will go to non free.
Not necessarily. I didn't mean a straight dependency but rather a
"suggests".
>
> > As an extra, I'm adding some information iccdump provided and which we
> >
> > should verify with upstream:
> >
> > krita/data/profiles/WideGamut.icm (No copyright)
> > krita/data/profiles/sRGB.icm (No copyright)
> > krita/data/profiles/scRGB.icm (© Cyrille Berger)
>
> Could you check the license^
>
> > krita25_lcms-builtin-sRGB_g100-truegamma.icc (v4 not supported by iccdump)
> > plugins/colorengines/lcms2/colorprofiles/data/fogra27l.icm (public domain)
> > plugins/colorengines/lcms2/colorprofiles/data/CMY.icm (copyright Sun
> > Microsystems, 1996)
>
> This one seems non free
I've talked upstream about licensing information for these files. They say
all these files was retrieved from the places stated in one of the README files,
namely: http://www.littlecms.com and http://www.scarse.org
Currently, littlecms.com url from where some of those profiles were retrieved
is broken. scarse.org is down.
Anyway, upstream confirms that those profiles licenses were either GPLv+ or
public domain and therefore compatible with DSFG.
In case this information is not enough, I'll recheck whether this files are
still available somewhere and their licensing details.
Regards,
--
Raúl Sánchez Siles
----->Proud Debian user<-----
Linux registered user #416098
Reply to: