On Wed, 2014-06-25 14:12:17 -0300, Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer wrote:
> On Wednesday 25 June 2014 22:30:34 Aníbal Monsalve Salazar wrote:
>> debdiff soprano_2.9.4+dfsg-1.dsc soprano_2.9.4+dfsg-1.1.dsc
>> diff -Nru soprano-2.9.4+dfsg/debian/changelog soprano-2.9.4+dfsg/debian/changelog
>> --- soprano-2.9.4+dfsg/debian/changelog 2013-11-04 15:13:52.000000000 +0000
>> +++ soprano-2.9.4+dfsg/debian/changelog 2014-06-24 10:47:30.000000000 +0100 @@
>> -1,3 +1,13 @@
>> +soprano (2.9.4+dfsg-1.1) unstable; urgency=medium
>> +
>> + * Non-maintainer upload.
>> + * Update symbols file.
>> + Patch by Sphinx Jiang <yishanj13@gmail.com>.
>> + Work done for Debian GSOC2014.
>> + Closes: #746916.
>
> This doesn't seems to be a patch generated by pkgkde-symbolshelper.
> I'm not even sure if it was done with build logs of all archs
> available or just one arch.
>
> Symbols need to be managed differently, it's not just a matter of
> building in one arch and diffing. You can take a look at [0]
>
> [0] <http://pkg-kde.alioth.debian.org/symbolfiles.html>
>
> Even after completing those steps you need to push to the archive and
> see what FTBFS, as (AFAIU) not all archs have already switched to gcc
> 4.9.
>
> So it's not strange to need more than one upload to fix the issue.
>
> I would recommend letting the maintainer solve this with time (maybe
> even waiting for a new upstream release, except if the package is
> holding a transition).
>
> Kinds regards, Lisandro.
>
> --
>
> Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer
> http://perezmeyer.com.ar/
> http://perezmeyer.blogspot.com/
Hello Lisandro and Sphinx,
I tested the patch by building soprano on three arches: mips, mipsel and
amd64. I think Sphinx did the same on mips64el and maybe other arches
but I'm not sure.
Yesterday, I uploaded soprano_2.9.4+dfsg-1.1 to delayed/2 and today I
moved it to delayed/10. Please let me know what would you like me to do.
:-)
Regards,
Aníbal