Bug#740814: marked as done (kde-window-manager not available in experimental)
Your message dated Wed, 05 Mar 2014 10:48:51 +0100
with message-id <1415352.3MD902rB9f@dabney>
and subject line Re: Bug#740814: kde-window-manager not available in experimental
has caused the Debian Bug report #740814,
regarding kde-window-manager not available in experimental
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)
--
740814: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=740814
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: kde-window-manager
Version: 4:4.11.7-1
Severity: wishlist
Dear Maintainer,
Altthough I use experimental for years and happily use kde 4.12.x from there,
I have still a bunch of packages that are still 4.11.x on my system.
The the list belows gives somes, kde-workspace also
I wonder why there are not build for 4.12.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: jessie/sid
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Kernel: Linux 3.12.13 (SMP w/4 CPU cores; PREEMPT)
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF8 (charmap=UTF-8) (ignored: LC_ALL set to en_US.UTF8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Versions of packages kde-window-manager depends on:
ii kde-runtime 4:4.12.3-1
ii kde-style-oxygen 4:4.11.7-1
ii libc6 2.18-4
ii libegl1-mesa [libegl1-x11] 10.1.0~rc2-1
ii libgcc1 1:4.8.2-16
ii libgl1-mesa-glx [libgl1] 10.1.0~rc2-1
ii libgles2-mesa [libgles2] 10.1.0~rc2-1
ii libice6 2:1.0.8-2
ii libkactivities6 4:4.12.3-1
ii libkcmutils4 4:4.12.3-1
ii libkdeclarative5 4:4.12.3-1
ii libkdecorations4abi2 4:4.11.7-1
ii libkdecore5 4:4.12.3-1
ii libkdeui5 4:4.12.3-1
ii libkio5 4:4.12.3-1
ii libknewstuff3-4 4:4.12.3-1
ii libkwineffects1abi5 4:4.11.7-1
ii libkwinglesutils1 4:4.11.7-1
ii libkwinglutils1abi2 4:4.11.7-1
ii libkworkspace4abi2 4:4.11.7-1
ii libplasma3 4:4.12.3-1
ii libqt4-dbus 4:4.8.5+git209-g718fae5+dfsg-1
ii libqt4-declarative 4:4.8.5+git209-g718fae5+dfsg-1
ii libqt4-script 4:4.8.5+git209-g718fae5+dfsg-1
ii libqtcore4 4:4.8.5+git209-g718fae5+dfsg-1
ii libqtgui4 4:4.8.5+git209-g718fae5+dfsg-1
ii libsm6 2:1.2.1-2
ii libstdc++6 4.8.2-16
ii libx11-6 2:1.6.2-1
ii libx11-xcb1 2:1.6.2-1
ii libxcb-composite0 1.10-2
ii libxcb-damage0 1.10-2
ii libxcb-image0 0.3.9-1
ii libxcb-keysyms1 0.3.9-1
ii libxcb-randr0 1.10-2
ii libxcb-render0 1.10-2
ii libxcb-shape0 1.10-2
ii libxcb-sync1 1.10-2
ii libxcb-xfixes0 1.10-2
ii libxcb1 1.10-2
ii libxcursor1 1:1.1.14-1
ii libxext6 2:1.3.2-1
ii libxrandr2 2:1.4.2-1
ii libxxf86vm1 1:1.1.3-1
ii perl 5.18.2-2+b1
kde-window-manager recommends no packages.
kde-window-manager suggests no packages.
-- no debconf information
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On Wednesday 05 March 2014 10:33:41 Eric Valette wrote:
> Package: kde-window-manager
> Version: 4:4.11.7-1
> Severity: wishlist
>
> Dear Maintainer,
>
> Altthough I use experimental for years and happily use kde 4.12.x from
> there, I have still a bunch of packages that are still 4.11.x on my system.
>
> The the list belows gives somes, kde-workspace also
>
> I wonder why there are not build for 4.12.
Upstream are not releasing any further feature updates in the 4.x series. 4.11
workspace is long term supported, and that's why you got a 4.11.7 there while
the rest of the packages are at 4.12.x. Other modules will also at a later
point stop their feature development in the 4.x series.
Thus, closing this bug.
/Sune
--
I didn’t stop pretending when I became an adult, it’s just that when I was a
kid I was pretending that I fit into the rules and structures of this world.
And now that I’m an adult, I pretend that those rules and structures exist.
- zefrank
--- End Message ---
Reply to: