[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#735488: Qt4 in arm64: wrap up of the current situation



On Monday 27 January 2014 22:32:01 Wookey wrote:
[snip]
> > Wookey: are there any arm64 porterboxes available? I can't promise
> > anything, but maybe at some point I could help...
> 
> Not yet. No. And I don't yet know when there might be. 'In time for
> Jessie, hopefully' is the only clue I've had so far from people who will
> be in a position to supply one. If you need builds done there are a
> couple of DDs who can get access (Riku and Fathi). I can do it
> indirectly. Probably best to pester me. I realise this is not at all
> convenient but access is very strictly controlled at the moment (because
> lawyers don't understand how work actually gets done).

He, lawyers :) Don't worry, I get the idea :)

To fully push the patches upstream we will need the -fpermisive stuff properly 
addressed though :-/


-- 
Why should I care about my chatter from yesterday?
Nothing prevents me from becoming wiser.
  Konrad Adenauer, former German chancellor.
  http://lwn.net/SubscriberLink/397422/60a270d48f933c67/

Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer
http://perezmeyer.com.ar/
http://perezmeyer.blogspot.com/

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.


Reply to: