Your message dated Thu, 09 Jan 2014 10:25:41 -0300 with message-id <21712503.sU1gvB5H62@luna> and subject line Re: Bug#734677: yet more info has caused the Debian Bug report #734677, regarding src:qtbase-opensource-src: qt5 packages aren't multi-arch ready to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 734677: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=734677 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
- To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>
- Subject: src:qtbase-opensource-src: qt5 packages aren't multi-arch ready
- From: Dima Kogan <dima@secretsauce.net>
- Date: Wed, 08 Jan 2014 19:50:45 -0800
- Message-id: <[🔎] 87bnzlhkyy.fsf@secretsauce.net>
Package: src:qtbase-opensource-src Severity: normal In Debian, QT5 packages have no multi-arch tags. Ubuntu has supposedly resolved this: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/qtbase-opensource-src/+bug/1209239
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
- To: 734677-submitter@bugs.debian.org, 734677-done@bugs.debian.org
- Subject: Re: Bug#734677: yet more info
- From: "Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer" <perezmeyer@gmail.com>
- Date: Thu, 09 Jan 2014 10:25:41 -0300
- Message-id: <21712503.sU1gvB5H62@luna>
- Reply-to: 734677@bugs.debian.org
- In-reply-to: <[🔎] 877ga9h36l.fsf@secretsauce.net>
- References: <[🔎] 877ga9h36l.fsf@secretsauce.net>
On Thursday 09 January 2014 02:14:58 Dima Kogan wrote: > The previous message included a patch that added multi-arch:same tags to > 4 packages. I had trouble building these packages, so I added those tags > to the pre-built packages already in Debian/experimental. I then tried > to co-install these to make sure that adding those tags was safe. 3 of > the 4 packages are fine. However in qtbase5-dev there's a conflicting file: > > /usr/include/qt5/QtCore/qconfig.h > > This is an issue in Ubuntu also, but I don't think they know it yet > (I'll comment on their bug shortly). Hi Dima! As you have just found, there are reasons why this packages aren't marked as m-a: same: they are not. They vary between archs, so you can't make them m-a: same. You can take a look at, for example, usr/include/qt5/QtCore/qconfig.h from different archs (I took armhf, amd64 and s390x, for example). Making the dev packages m-a: same would be a bug, so I'm closing this report. Kinds regards, Lisandro. -- Theory and practice sometimes clash. And when that happens, theory loses. Every single time. Linus Benedict Torvalds. Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer http://perezmeyer.com.ar/ http://perezmeyer.blogspot.com/Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
--- End Message ---