Bug#720462: nepomuk-core-runtime: missing dependency from nepomuk to virtuoso
Package: nepomuk-core-runtime
Version: 4:4.10.5-1
Severity: normal
Dear Maintainer,
*** Please consider answering these questions, where appropriate ***
* What led up to the situation?
After upgrading kmail to kmail 2, it is necessary to have a
running akonadi server, and also nepomuk is connected to this.
* What exactly did you do (or not do) that was effective (or
ineffective)?
Well, kmail is not working, probably the migration tool got stuck.
But this bug is on Nepomuk, and the issue is that within KDE
settings dialogue, section desktop search displayed:
"Nepomuk installation is not complete". So Nepomuk was not usable
despite all packages were installed.
* What was the outcome of this action?
see above
* What outcome did you expect instead?
a running deskop search engine nepomuk, and besides
kmail 2 working :/
Solution: After installing virtuoso-minimal and its
dependencies, desktop search works, no more complaints
on behalf of kde settings dialogue.
*** End of the template - remove these lines ***
-- System Information:
Debian Release: jessie/sid
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Foreign Architectures: i386
Kernel: Linux 3.9-3.slh.1-aptosid-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU cores; PREEMPT)
Locale: LANG=de_DE.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=de_DE.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
Versions of packages nepomuk-core-runtime depends on:
ii libavcodec53 7:0.10.3-dmo1
ii libavformat53 7:0.10.3-dmo1
ii libavutil51 8:1.0.7-dmo2
ii libc6 2.17-92
ii libexiv2-12 0.23-1
ii libgcc1 1:4.8.1-9
ii libkdecore5 4:4.10.5-1
ii libkdeui5 4:4.10.5-1
ii libkidletime4 4:4.10.5-1
ii libkio5 4:4.10.5-1
ii libnepomukcore4 4:4.10.5-1
ii libpoppler-qt4-3 0.18.4-8
ii libqt4-dbus 4:4.8.5+dfsg-3
ii libqtcore4 4:4.8.5+dfsg-3
ii libqtgui4 4:4.8.5+dfsg-3
ii libsolid4 4:4.10.5-1
ii libsoprano4 2.9.2+dfsg.1-4
ii libstdc++6 4.8.1-9
ii libtag1c2a 1.8-dmo1
nepomuk-core-runtime recommends no packages.
nepomuk-core-runtime suggests no packages.
-- no debconf information
Reply to: