[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#669278: Processed: found 656586 in 2.3.2-1, found 672160 in 1.85, found 690216 in aspell-am/0.03-1-3 ..., affects 500618 ...



On 2012-10-20 22:24, Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer wrote:
> Believe it or not, this is trigerred by a loop dependency between two packages 
> and apt gets confused. So far we could not find another way of solving it (and 

I really like the analysis and you have my full support for solving the
dependency loop by splitting the package (instead of adding the
transitional package I proposed).

> So, marking all KDE packages as "found" doesn't really helps.

It helps piuparts to automatically classify the failed logs and move
them to the affected list. For this to work, the bug needs to have an
Affects: for the package where the bug is observed - and piuparts wants
to have a bug marked as found in the exact version the logfile is about.
Therefore you'll see from time to time a few new found/affects on that
bug ... and with all the about 40 packages failing with
immediate-configure *phonon* problems being moved aside, I can
concentrate on analyzing the "more interesting" failures (and piuparts
will keep checking the affected packages frequently to see if some
dependency got fixed).

Setting the affects is the right thing to do anyway to have the bug show
up in the bug lists of packages where it is observed. Setting the found
on some foreign package is a little abuse of the BTS and if you know a
better solution ... we can change things. key-value usertags in the BTS
would be nice :-) (or even better key-multivalue usertags)


Andreas


Reply to: