Bug#676957: libqt4-dev: including qtconcurrentfilter.h generates a gcc warning
Package: libqt4-dev
Version: 4:4.8.2-1
Severity: normal
During compilation of one of my programs the following warning is generated:
In file included from /usr/include/qt4/QtCore/QtCore:50:0,
from /usr/include/qt4/QtDeclarative/QtDeclarative:3,
from ../../epubreader/reader/src/epubreaderapplication.cxx:22:
/usr/include/qt4/QtCore/qtconcurrentfilter.h: In function 'QtConcurrent::ThreadEngineStarter<void> QtConcurrent::filterInternal(Sequence&, KeepFunctor, ReduceFunctor)':
/usr/include/qt4/QtCore/qtconcurrentfilter.h:108:47: warning: typedef 'Iterator' locally defined but not used [-Wunused-local-typedefs]
typedef typename Sequence::const_iterator Iterator;
^
This did not happen with Qt 4.7. The typeded looks unused, so the warning is valid.
The wanring-related options were: -Wall -W
-- System Information:
Debian Release: wheezy/sid
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Kernel: Linux 3.2.0-2-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=uk_UA.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=uk_UA.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
Versions of packages libqt4-dev depends on:
ii libqt4-dbus 4:4.8.2-1
ii libqt4-declarative 4:4.8.2-1
ii libqt4-designer 4:4.8.2-1
ii libqt4-dev-bin 4:4.8.2-1
ii libqt4-help 4:4.8.2-1
ii libqt4-network 4:4.8.2-1
ii libqt4-qt3support 4:4.8.2-1
ii libqt4-script 4:4.8.2-1
ii libqt4-scripttools 4:4.8.2-1
ii libqt4-sql 4:4.8.2-1
ii libqt4-svg 4:4.8.2-1
ii libqt4-test 4:4.8.2-1
ii libqt4-xml 4:4.8.2-1
ii libqt4-xmlpatterns 4:4.8.2-1
ii libqtcore4 4:4.8.2-1
ii libqtgui4 4:4.8.2-1
ii qt4-linguist-tools 4:4.8.2-1
ii qt4-qmake 4:4.8.2-1
Versions of packages libqt4-dev recommends:
pn libqt4-opengl-dev <none>
ii libqtwebkit-dev 2.2.1-4+b1
Versions of packages libqt4-dev suggests:
pn firebird-dev <none>
pn libmysqlclient-dev <none>
pn libpq-dev <none>
pn libsqlite0-dev <none>
pn libsqlite3-dev <none>
ii qt4-dev-tools 4:4.8.2-1
ii qt4-doc 4:4.8.2-1
ii unixodbc-dev 2.2.14p2-5
-- no debconf information
Reply to: