Re: BinNMU breaks QT4

To: Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer <perezmeyer@gmail.com>
Cc: debian-release@lists.debian.org, debian-qt-kde@lists.debian.org, "Adam D. Barratt" <adam@adam-barratt.org.uk>, YunQiang Su <wzssyqa@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: BinNMU breaks QT4
From: ancow <bugs@ancow.no-ip.org>
Date: Wed, 15 Aug 2012 01:48:24 +0200
Message-id: <[🔎] 201208150148.24998.bugs@ancow.no-ip.org>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 201208142024.55630.perezmeyer@gmail.com>
References: <CAKcpw6XUqos996n=N9hxH_9ze0e4roTmZBUEAX9hBH+YpofEbQ@mail.gmail.com> <[🔎] 1344698302.2978.48.camel@jacala.jungle.funky-badger.org> <[🔎] 201208142024.55630.perezmeyer@gmail.com>

Am Mittwoch 15.08.2012, 01:24:48 schrieb Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer:
> We (as in pkg-kde team) have decided to avoid reuploading Qt for some more
> time in case some other bug appears. On the other hand, I really don't know
> if this kind of upload would be acceptable by the RT for unblock.

Seeing as how the buggy Qt version has made it into wheezy now, do you think 
you could reconsider that stance? Or do you consider multiarch issues too 
unimportant to rectify this?

Multiarch being a release goal, I'd consider this issue release critical, but 
maybe that's just me...

  --Reinhold

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: BinNMU breaks QT4
  - From: Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer <perezmeyer@gmail.com>
- Re: BinNMU breaks QT4
  - From: Julien Cristau <jcristau@debian.org>

References:
- Re: BinNMU breaks QT4
  - From: "Adam D. Barratt" <adam@adam-barratt.org.uk>
- Re: BinNMU breaks QT4
  - From: Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer <perezmeyer@gmail.com>

Prev by Date: Re: BinNMU breaks QT4
Next by Date: Processed: Re: Bug#683461: konqueror dependency problem causes apt-get error
Previous by thread: Re: BinNMU breaks QT4
Next by thread: Re: BinNMU breaks QT4
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread