Re: BinNMU breaks QT4
On Sat, Aug 11, 2012 at 11:18 PM, Adam D. Barratt
<adam@adam-barratt.org.uk> wrote:
> On Sat, 2012-08-11 at 22:43 +0800, YunQiang Su wrote:
>> I update my system (Sid) just mow, and got some errors due to BinNUM of QT.
>
> and have you discussed this with the maintainers, who requested the
> binNMU? (CCed)
>
>> I aware of the technical debate on multiarch and binnum, it seems that all guys
>> there have their sufficient arguments. It's great technical debate, WHILE:
>>
>> The problem is there unsloved, and USERs are using my system, and
>> We know exactly that the binnum of some packages will broken system certainly.
>
> There's no need to shout. It really doesn't help your point.
>
> If you're running a multi-user system and basing it on sid, you really
> have to expect some breakage, multi-arch or not.
>
>> Why we still BinNMU these packages before this problem completely resolved?
>>
>> Must we?
>
> Well it avoids tying up several hours of buildd time on architectures
> not affected by the issue the binNMU was scheduled for (i.e. 9/14).
>
I install both i386 and amd64, when I upgrade, both of them are built ok.
etc, I upgrade i386 and amd64 at the same time.
> Regards,
>
> Adam
>
--
YunQiang Su
Reply to: