[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#674692: libnepomuk4: Nepomuk complains about missing virtuoso server resp. virtuoso soprano plugin



Package: libnepomuk4
Version: 4:4.7.4-4
Severity: normal

Hi,

cleaning up my system from packages without source, I removed all the
virtuoso packages; aptitude didn't complain about any missing dependency
but since then I get from KDE the attached message:

	Semantic Data Storage - Nepomuk Semantic Desktop needs the Virtuoso
	RDF server to store its data. Installing the Virtuoso Soprano plugin
	is mandatory for using Nepomuk.

I am NOT complaining about the fact that Virtuoso disappeared from
testing, I am complaining about the fact that Nepomuk doesn't depend on
Virtuoso but complains that it is absolutely required to work.
In my opinion, this should be at least a warrant for a "Recommends" if
not a "Depends".
I have seen that libnepomuk4 depends on libsoprano4 which depends on
soprano-daemon which _suggests_ virtuoso-minimal, but that is definitely
not a strong enough dependency, or Nepomuk shouldn't complain about a
missing Virtuoso and confuse (and annoy to be honest) Debian users.

Thanks, Eric

-- System Information:
Debian Release: wheezy/sid
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (990, 'testing'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: i386 (i686)

Kernel: Linux 3.2.0-2-686-pae (SMP w/2 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_IE.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_IE.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash

Versions of packages libnepomuk4 depends on:
ii  libc6        2.13-32
ii  libkdecore5  4:4.7.4-4
ii  libkdeui5    4:4.7.4-4
ii  libqt4-dbus  4:4.8.1-1
ii  libqtcore4   4:4.8.1-1
ii  libqtgui4    4:4.8.1-1
ii  libsoprano4  2.7.5+dfsg.1-1
ii  libstdc++6   4.7.0-8

libnepomuk4 recommends no packages.

libnepomuk4 suggests no packages.

-- no debconf information



Reply to: