[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#545139: Re: Bug#545139: fixed in akonadi 1.3.1-4



Hello,

On antradienis 07 Birželis 2011 16:05:06 Ansgar Burchardt wrote:
> Modestas Vainius <modax@debian.org> writes:
> > 21:59, Magnus Holmgren rašė:
> >> On lördagen den 30 april 2011, you stated the following:
> >>> Changes:
> >>>   akonadi (1.3.1-4) unstable; urgency=low
> >>>   .
> >>>   
> >>>     * Add patch 04_socket_location.diff to allow akonadi-server to run
> >>>     when
> >>> 
> >>> HOME is mounted to the network filesystem (Closes: #545139). Thanks to
> >>> Ansgar Burchardt for the patch.
> >> 
> >> After upgrading to that version, kmail stopped working because it (or
> >> rather libakonadi-kde4, or libakonadiprivate1?) still tries to use the
> >> old socket path.
> > 
> > To be honest, your statement is conflicting. "kmail *stopped* working
> > because it still tries to use *old* socket path". It is either kmail
> > worked before (with old path) or it didn't (hence you need new
> > path). Sorry, but I don't understand.
> > 
> >>   What have I missed regarding how clients find the socket? (No socket
> >> 
> >> path is defined in ~/.config/akonadi/akonadiserverrc, so the new default
> >> is used.)
> > 
> > Akonadi is supposed to create a socket in /tmp only if it can't do
> > that in $HOME.
> 
> No, with the patch akonadi will always create the socket in /tmp and
> only place a symlink in $HOME (unless SocketDirectory is set in the
> configuration).
> 
> This means that new processes will not be able to connect to the old
> socket after an upgrade; it should work correctly once the database
> process is restarted.  I did not bother with caring about the upgrade
> case when I wrote the initial patch, but for a stable update we might
> want to look for an already existing socket in the old location first.

Stable update has been requested a month and a half ago [1] and, apparently, 
already is a pretty complicated decision for release team. So please make this 
as painless as possible or it may never get to stable.

[1] http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=624647


-- 
Modestas Vainius <modax@debian.org>

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.


Reply to: