Bug#631918: ktimetracker: Sorting a time column does not sort numerical.
Package: ktimetracker
Version: 4:4.4.7-3
Severity: minor
The main window of ktimetracker shows columns for the task name and time spend
on it. On startup, the column with the task name is sorted alphabeticaly. In
case I click on the columnt header of the time column, that column gets sorted.
It is however also sorted alphabeticaly and not numeric. A time of 16:00 is in
front of 8:00.
Sort the time columns using numericaly sort. Probably using the total number of
seconds.
Regards,
Vincent Smeets
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 6.0.2
APT prefers stable-updates
APT policy: (500, 'stable-updates'), (500, 'stable')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.32-5-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_US, LC_CTYPE=en_US (charmap=ISO-8859-1)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
Versions of packages ktimetracker depends on:
ii kdebase-runtime 4:4.4.5-1 runtime components from the offici
ii kdepim-runtime 4:4.4.7-1 Runtime components for akonadi-kde
ii libc6 2.11.2-10 Embedded GNU C Library: Shared lib
ii libkcal4 4:4.4.5-2 library for handling calendar data
ii libkdecore5 4:4.4.5-2+squeeze2 the KDE Platform Core Library
ii libkdepim4 4:4.4.7-3 KDE PIM library
ii libkdeui5 4:4.4.5-2+squeeze2 the KDE Platform User Interface Li
ii libkio5 4:4.4.5-2+squeeze2 the Network-enabled File Managemen
ii libkontactinterface4 4:4.4.5-2 Kontact interface library
ii libkparts4 4:4.4.5-2+squeeze2 the Framework for the KDE Platform
ii libkresources4 4:4.4.5-2 the KDE Resource framework library
ii libkutils4 4:4.4.5-2+squeeze2 various utility classes for the KD
ii libqt4-dbus 4:4.6.3-4+squeeze1 Qt 4 D-Bus module
ii libqt4-xml 4:4.6.3-4+squeeze1 Qt 4 XML module
ii libqtcore4 4:4.6.3-4+squeeze1 Qt 4 core module
ii libqtgui4 4:4.6.3-4+squeeze1 Qt 4 GUI module
ii libstdc++6 4.4.5-8 The GNU Standard C++ Library v3
ii libxss1 1:1.2.0-2 X11 Screen Saver extension library
ktimetracker recommends no packages.
ktimetracker suggests no packages.
-- no debconf information
Reply to: