[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#261150: marked as done (default-x-display-manager asked at inflated priority)

Your message dated Sat, 19 Feb 2011 18:09:22 +0000
with message-id <E1PqrFC-00019F-Jr@franck.debian.org>
and subject line Bug#613491: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #261150,
regarding default-x-display-manager asked at inflated priority
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
261150: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=261150
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- 
Package: xdm,gdm,kdm
Severity: normal

xdm, gdm, and kde all ask the shared/default-x-display-manager at high
priority. Debconf policy is that high priority is for items that don't
have a reasonable default. I think that as long as any of xdm, gdm, or
kdm is the default, that qualifies as a reaonable default display
manager; each of them is usable. If there's some alternatives-style 
ranking going on to rank more usable display managers higher and make
them more likely to be the default, that's even better.

Anyway, right now an install of debian with gdm and kdm asks which to
use, even at high priority, and I think that's an unnecessary question
to ask for a high priority install.

-- 
see shy jo

-- 
see shy jo

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- 
Version: 2.20.11-4+rm

Dear submitter,

as the package gdm has just been removed from the Debian archive
unstable we hereby close the associated bug reports.  We are sorry
that we couldn't deal with your issue properly.

For details on the removal, please see http://bugs.debian.org/613491

The version of this package that was in Debian prior to this removal
can still be found using http://snapshot.debian.org/.

This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is
a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing
ftpmaster@debian.org.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Alexander Reichle-Schmehl (the ftpmaster behind the curtain)

--- End Message ---
Reply to: