[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#610534: kiten slowly leaks memory

Package: kiten
Version: 4:4.4.5-2
Severity: important

I use kiten's clipboard search feature a lot. So I run kiten,
start browsing a site, hit a word I don't know or can't read, 
highlight it and look at the results kiten has.

If I start kiten and leave it running eventually it's resisdent size
hits 1G, then slowly it'll grow to about 1.5GB at which point my system
becomes unusable.

-- System Information:
Debian Release: 6.0
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)

Kernel: Linux 2.6.36-trunk-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_GB.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_GB.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash

Versions of packages kiten depends on:
ii  kdebase-runtime               4:4.4.5-1  runtime components from the offici
ii  libc6                         2.11.2-7   Embedded GNU C Library: Shared lib
ii  libkdecore5                   4:4.4.5-2  the KDE Platform Core Library
ii  libkdeui5                     4:4.4.5-2  the KDE Platform User Interface Li
ii  libkhtml5                     4:4.4.5-2  the KHTML Web Content Rendering En
ii  libkio5                       4:4.4.5-2  the Network-enabled File Managemen
ii  libkiten4                     4:4.4.5-2  libraries for the Kiten Japanese r
ii  libkparts4                    4:4.4.5-2  the Framework for the KDE Platform
ii  libqt4-dbus                   4:4.6.3-4  Qt 4 D-Bus module
ii  libqtcore4                    4:4.6.3-4  Qt 4 core module
ii  libqtgui4                     4:4.6.3-4  Qt 4 GUI module
ii  libstdc++6                    4.5.1-11   The GNU Standard C++ Library v3
ii  ttf-sazanami-gothic           20040629-8 Sazanami Gothic Japanese TrueType 
ii  ttf-sazanami-mincho           20040629-8 Sazanami Mincho Japanese TrueType 

kiten recommends no packages.

Versions of packages kiten suggests:
ii  khelpcenter4                  4:4.4.5-1  help center

-- no debconf information

Reply to: