Bug#582859: [kontact] configuration windows for kontact should go fullscreen on a 1024x600 screen
Package: kontact
Version: 4:4.4.3-1
Severity: minor
--- Please enter the report below this line. ---
On a netbook using the "netbook" profile, almost every application is starting
fulllscreen. As long as the window itself can adapt to a 1024x600 netbook
screen everything is going fine. The configuration windows for kontact don't
adapt correctly : the tiniest size of the window is far bigger than the
1024x600 resolution, so a big part of the window is out of the screen,
including validation buttons (apply, validate, cancel).
It would be fine if the smallest possible size of this configuration window
could be decreased to fit in a netbook screen (less than 1024x600)
thanks !
--- System information. ---
Architecture: amd64
Kernel: Linux 2.6.32-5-amd64
Debian Release: squeeze/sid
500 unstable ftp.fr.debian.org
500 testing security.debian.org
500 testing ftp.fr.debian.org
--- Package information. ---
Depends (Version) | Installed
======================================-+-==============
kdebase-runtime | 4:4.4.3-1
kdepim-runtime | 4:4.4.3-1
libakonadi-kde4 (>= 4:4.4) | 4:4.4.3-1
libc6 (>= 2.2.5) | 2.10.2-8
libkdecore5 (>= 4:4.4.0) | 4:4.4.3-1
libkdepim4 (= 4:4.4.3-1) | 4:4.4.3-1
libkdeui5 (>= 4:4.4) | 4:4.4.3-1
libkhtml5 (>= 4:4.4) | 4:4.4.3-1
libkio5 (>= 4:4.4) | 4:4.4.3-1
libkontactinterface4 (>= 4:4.4.0) | 4:4.4.3-1
libkparts4 (>= 4:4.4) | 4:4.4.3-1
libkpimidentities4 (>= 4:4.4) | 4:4.4.3-1
libkpimutils4 (>= 4:4.4) | 4:4.4.3-1
libkutils4 (>= 4:4.4) | 4:4.4.3-1
libqt4-dbus (>= 4:4.5.3) | 4:4.6.2-4
libqtcore4 (>= 4:4.6.1) | 4:4.6.2-4
libqtgui4 (>= 4:4.5.3) | 4:4.6.2-4
libstdc++6 (>= 4.4.0) | 4.4.4-1
Recommends (Version) | Installed
===========================-+-===========
kmail | 4:4.4.3-1
knotes | 4:4.4.3-1
akregator | 4:4.4.3-1
kaddressbook | 4:4.4.3-1
korganizer | 4:4.4.3-1
Suggests (Version) | Installed
==========================-+-===========
gnokii |
kjots | 4:4.4.3-1
ktimeticker |
knode | 4:4.4.3-1
--
Fabrice Flore-Thébault
Reply to: