Your message dated Sat, 1 May 2010 15:32:41 +0300 with message-id <201005011532.46444.modestas@vainius.eu> and subject line Re: Bug#579811: Does linking to libkcal4 really must pull kdepim-runtime ? has caused the Debian Bug report #579811, regarding Does linking to libkcal4 really must pull kdepim-runtime ? to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 579811: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=579811 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
- To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>
- Subject: Does linking to libkcal4 really must pull kdepim-runtime ?
- From: Regis Boudin <regis@debian.org>
- Date: Sat, 01 May 2010 01:16:59 +0200
- Message-id: <20100430231659.9757.37095.reportbug@x200s>
Package: libkcal4 Version: 4:4.4.2-1 Severity: normal Tags: experimental Hi, I'm the maintainer of Tellico, and I tried to build it against the coming KDE4.4.2 from experimental. I noticed the split of the package into libraries, which is great. However, I also noticed that they pretty much all make the application linking to them depend on kdepim-runtime. This pretty much seems to defeat the purpose of splitting the package, since tellico ends up depending on kdepim-runtime, which in turn pulls akonadi-server (and mysql-server-core as well). Tellico is linked to libkcal and libkabc for really non-core features, therefore it would be really nice if you could remove the dependency on kdepim- runtime in the shlibs files, so the users don't end up pulling all the kdepim infrastructure for an optional feature. This abviously applies to the libraries tellico depends on, but probably to all the other lib packages built from kdepimlibs. Thanks, Regis -- System Information: Debian Release: squeeze/sid APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Kernel: Linux 2.6.33-2-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=en_GB.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_GB.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash Versions of packages libkcal4 depends on: ii libc6 2.10.2-7 Embedded GNU C Library: Shared lib ii libical0 0.44-3 iCalendar library implementation i ii libkabc4 4:4.4.2-1 library for handling address book ii libkdecore5 4:4.4.2-1 the KDE Platform Core Library ii libkdeui5 4:4.4.2-1 the KDE Platform User Interface Li ii libkio5 4:4.4.2-1 the Network-enabled File Managemen ii libkpimutils4 4:4.4.2-1 library for dealing with email add ii libkresources4 4:4.4.2-1 the KDE Resource framework library ii libqt4-xml 4:4.6.2-4 Qt 4 XML module ii libqtcore4 4:4.6.2-4 Qt 4 core module ii libqtgui4 4:4.6.2-4 Qt 4 GUI module ii libstdc++6 4.5.0-2 The GNU Standard C++ Library v3 libkcal4 recommends no packages. libkcal4 suggests no packages. -- no debconf information
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
- To: Regis Boudin <regis@boudin.name>, 579811-done@bugs.debian.org
- Subject: Re: Bug#579811: Does linking to libkcal4 really must pull kdepim-runtime ?
- From: Modestas Vainius <modestas@vainius.eu>
- Date: Sat, 1 May 2010 15:32:41 +0300
- Message-id: <201005011532.46444.modestas@vainius.eu>
- In-reply-to: <[🔎] 1272715313.2501.46.camel@x200s>
- References: <20100430231659.9757.37095.reportbug@x200s> <[🔎] 201005011354.59166.modestas@vainius.eu> <[🔎] 1272715313.2501.46.camel@x200s>
Hello, On šeštadienis 01 Gegužė 2010 15:01:53 Regis Boudin wrote: > Yeah, not much help, here... If you think the bug is not relevant, > please close it. Proceeding -- Modestas Vainius <modestas@vainius.eu>Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
--- End Message ---