[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#588541: polkit-kde-authentication-agent-1: bug confirmed on my system



Package: polkit-kde-1
Version: 0.95.1-2
Severity: normal
File: polkit-kde-authentication-agent-1



-- System Information:
Debian Release: squeeze/sid
  APT prefers oldstable
  APT policy: (500, 'oldstable'), (500, 'testing'), (500, 'stable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)

Kernel: Linux 2.6.32-5-686 (SMP w/4 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=de_AT.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=de_AT.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash

Versions of packages polkit-kde-1 depends on:
ii  kdebase-runtime               4:4.4.5-1  runtime components from the offici
ii  kdelibs5                      4:4.4.5-1  transitional package for the KDE D
ii  libc6                         2.11.2-2   Embedded GNU C Library: Shared lib
ii  libgcc1                       1:4.4.2-9  GCC support library
ii  libpolkit-qt-1-0              0.95.1-1   PolicyKit-qt-1 library
ii  libqt4-dbus                   4:4.6.3-1  Qt 4 D-Bus module
ii  libqt4-svg                    4:4.6.3-1  Qt 4 SVG module
ii  libqtcore4                    4:4.6.3-1  Qt 4 core module
ii  libqtgui4                     4:4.6.3-1  Qt 4 GUI module
ii  libstdc++6                    4.4.2-9    The GNU Standard C++ Library v3
ii  policykit-1                   0.96-1     framework for managing administrat

polkit-kde-1 recommends no packages.

polkit-kde-1 suggests no packages.

-- no debconf information

The crash happens right after login (from gdm 2.20.10-1 for reasons I cannot change) 
into KDE, every single time and 100% reproducible also through starting the 
application again as offered by "Dr. Konqi". Knetworkmanager is not installed 
on my system. The apt-policy quoted above is irrelevant and an old residue on this
almost exclusively squeeze machine with only very few standalone sid packages. 
Hardware is a pre-2005 real dual CPU Xeon setup on an Asus board. The bug is a nuisance
that needs to be clicked away but breaks nothing for me.

Regards, --AvH



Reply to: