[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#510872: marked as done (KDEPIM-Wizard: scalixwizard improperly sets up Kalendar free/busy connection information)



Your message dated Wed, 5 May 2010 12:04:38 +0200
with message-id <201005051204.38562.ewoerner@kde.org>
and subject line 
has caused the Debian Bug report #510872,
regarding KDEPIM-Wizard: scalixwizard improperly sets up Kalendar free/busy connection information
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
510872: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=510872
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: kdepim-wizards
Version: 4:3.5.9-5
Severity: normal

We have a Scalix server for mail and shared calendars; when we set up Kontact with the scalixwizard it puts this into the "Configure Kontact > Calendar > Free/Busy > Server URL" fields (for both Publish and Recieve):
###
scalix://User%20Name@xxxx.myscalixdomain.net/freebusy/Calendar/User.Name@emaildomain.com
###

Note what it is doing, scalixwizard replaced the . (dot) in my email address with %20 (and, later, the other punctiation is replaced as well, but Kalendar gets its error before that data is sent) and fixing this alone doesn't resolve the issue.  When one then tries to publish or retrieve information, this leads to the error:
###
The software could not upload your free/busy list to the URL 'scalix://UserAuthorization failed, Unable to login. Probably the password is wrong. The server xxxx.myscalixdomain.net replied: LOGIN failure, user name or password rejected authentication not supported0Name@xxxx.myscalixdomain.net/freebusy/Calendar/User.Name%40emaildomain.com'. There might be a problem with the access rights, or you specified an incorrect URL. The system said: %2.
Please check the URL or contact your system administrator.
###

The work around for this is to sigle-quote the Server URL after correcting it, so that it reads:
###
'scalix://User.Name@xxxx.myscalixdomain.net/freebusy/Calendar/User.Name@emaildomain.com'
###
Note that double-quoting the Server URL doesn't work, nor does trying to escape (\) the punctuation issues.
This error may not exist for everyone, as it likely depends somewhat on how one is required to log into the server, etc., but it has been a long time annoyance with only recently the work-around figured out.


-- System Information:
Debian Release: 5.0
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (500, 'testing')
Architecture: i386 (i686)

Kernel: Linux 2.6.26-1-686 (SMP w/2 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash

Versions of packages kdepim-wizards depends on:
ii  kdelibs4c2a      4:3.5.10.dfsg.1-0lenny1 core libraries and binaries for al
ii  kdepim-kresource 4:3.5.9-5               KDE pim resource plugins
ii  libc6            2.7-16                  GNU C Library: Shared libraries
ii  libgcc1          1:4.3.2-1               GCC support library
ii  libkcal2b        4:3.5.9-5               KDE calendaring library
ii  libkdepim1a      4:3.5.9-5               KDE PIM library
ii  libkpimidentitie 4:3.5.9-5               KDE PIM user identity information 
ii  libqt3-mt        3:3.3.8b-5              Qt GUI Library (Threaded runtime v
ii  libstdc++6       4.3.2-1                 The GNU Standard C++ Library v3

kdepim-wizards recommends no packages.

Versions of packages kdepim-wizards suggests:
pn  egroupware                    <none>     (no description available)

-- no debconf information



--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Version: 4:4.4.3-1

The submitter of the bug cannot provide additional information anymore.


--- End Message ---

Reply to: