[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#260083: marked as done (knode: Standard charset for undeclared postings)

Your message dated Mon, 22 Feb 2010 02:59:39 +0100
with message-id <201002220259.39664.ewoerner@kde.org>
and subject line Re: knode: Standard charset for undeclared postings
has caused the Debian Bug report #260083,
regarding knode: Standard charset for undeclared postings
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
260083: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=260083
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- 
Package: knode
Version: 4:3.2.2-2
Severity: wishlist

I receive many postings that are written with ISO8859-1 or -15, but the poster didn't declared that in the headers.

My own postings are writted (and declared) with utf-8. If I select "View - Charset - Automatic", messages without a charset will be decoded with my own setting (utf-8). This causes a loss of umlauts in received messages that come without a declaration.

It would be nice to be able to select a default charset for such undeclared messages, independant from the charset for new messages.

TIA! Michael.

-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (600, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.7
Locale: LANG=de_DE@euro, LC_CTYPE=de_DE@euro

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- 
Version: 4:4.0.68+svn794641-1

The ability to set the default charset for received posting per group has been 
available at least throughout KDE SC 4. The bug you reported has therefore 
been fixed.

--- End Message ---
Reply to: