[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#564080: Bug#562884: proposals


On Donnerstag, 7. Januar 2010, Julien Cristau wrote:
> On Thu, Jan  7, 2010 at 16:39:05 +0100, Holger Levsen wrote:
> > IMO either the screensaver should disable sysrq while it's locked (and
> > enable it after locking) or the screensaver shouldnt lock the screen,
> > when sysrq is enabled (and output a warning message).
> X screen savers don't run as root.

there could be a setuid helper binary only doing what Uli proposed in 

> (I assume by 'sysrq' you mean the 
> oom killer.)



Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

Reply to: