Bug#513382: Filesystem backend

To: 513382@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Bug#513382: Filesystem backend
From: LEDUQUE Mickaël <mleduque@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 9 Aug 2009 18:57:19 +0200
Message-id: <[🔎] 4fddc71b0908090957l47b1a1ebpd437389545c3ad7e@mail.gmail.com>
Reply-to: LEDUQUE Mickaël <mleduque@gmail.com>, 513382@bugs.debian.org
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 200908091532.14319.kevin.krammer@gmx.at>
References: <[🔎] 4fddc71b0908081048p7390f18ar19dcb29ef55a601f@mail.gmail.com> <[🔎] 200908091359.34100.kevin.krammer@gmx.at> <[🔎] 4fddc71b0908090548o195e498ax4e7a82b98035fa7c@mail.gmail.com> <[🔎] 200908091532.14319.kevin.krammer@gmx.at>

In fact, in my opinion, the point is to not have the data in ANY big, full featured, and space hungry database software.
I don't understand why something as simple as an address can't just be stored in whatever file format you could name. Even csv would work! What does a relational database do better when the only kind of search I do is based on the contact name?

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Bug#513382: Filesystem backend
  - From: Kevin Krammer <kevin.krammer@gmx.at>

References:
- Bug#513382: Filesystem backend
  - From: LEDUQUE Mickaël <mleduque@gmail.com>
- Re: Bug#513382: Filesystem backend
  - From: Kevin Krammer <kevin.krammer@gmx.at>
- Bug#513382: Filesystem backend
  - From: LEDUQUE Mickaël <mleduque@gmail.com>
- Bug#513382: Filesystem backend
  - From: Kevin Krammer <kevin.krammer@gmx.at>

Prev by Date: meta-kde_51_amd64.changes ACCEPTED
Next by Date: Bug#513382: Filesystem backend
Previous by thread: Bug#513382: Filesystem backend
Next by thread: Bug#513382: Filesystem backend
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread