[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#532604: closed by Armin Berres <armin@space-based.de> (Re: Bug#532604: KDE 4:3.5 -> KDE 4:4.2 - failed upgrade)



To get the old menu style back, right click on the menu button and choose 
"Switch to Classic Menu Style".

Josh


On Saturday 13 June 2009 02:36:15 pm Jastra wrote:
> Good Afternoon,
>
> Well, bug is closed, it is not a bug...
> Finally I had to remove the stopped packages, and then I could continue
> with upgrade to KDE4.
> It was definetely bad experience to be not sure, how much
> will be lost, even in "testing" standards.
>
> After some fights I have installed the minimal KDE.
> First impression: kdm does not accept my login, after switching to gdm I
> could log...
> After any migration - backup procedure, I could discover, that user
> interface is like modern Windows...
> Is it really no way out from this mess?
> Can I get old menu system back?
> Or just not to use KDE any more?
>
>
>            ~;     Yes, I know, there are many alternative window
>           ,/|\,   managers...
>         ,/' |\ \,  Uff... Thanks for reply...
>       ,/'   | |  \  There are just my complaints...
>     ,/'     | |   |   Greetings
>    /_____,,,'-----/   Basia Glowacka
>    \         .,;;/@,
> ~~`~^~jgs^~^~@@%%^~^
>
> On Wed, 10 Jun 2009, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
> > This is an automatic notification regarding your Bug report
> > which was filed against the kdebase-bin package:
> >
> > #532604: KDE 4:3.5 -> KDE 4:4.2 - failed upgrade
> >
> > It has been closed by Armin Berres <armin@space-based.de>.
> >
> > Their explanation is attached below along with your original report.
> > If this explanation is unsatisfactory and you have not received a
> > better one in a separate message then please contact Armin Berres
> > <armin@space-based.de> by replying to this email.
> >
> >
> > --
> > 532604: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=532604
> > Debian Bug Tracking System
> > Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems




Reply to: