On Tuesday 17 February 2009 08:49:23 you wrote: > It is taking a bit more time to work on merging with Debian, as I have lots > of activities in KDE KIPI Plugins (due to freeze after rc2) and Kubuntu > (feature freeze in couple of days). :-( NO problem. I have pushed rc2 into Debian experimental, but we can do as many subsequent releases as we like. Also I like to work you are going upstream on kipi, so happy for your priority to be there :-) > I have good and bad news: > - good: I see no major difference in content between current Ubuntu package > and Debian SVN (will list notable changes) Great! > - bad: ubuntu uses kde4.mk and need to switch to pkg-kde-tools That could be better for a whole bunch of reasons (Cc:ed) > In general, Debian package (in SVN) is the right base, but I see the > following changes that can be merged from Ubuntu: > - Depends: drop kde-icons-oxygen (anyway dependency through > kdebase-runtime) Yes agreed. > - Recommends: add kipi-plugins (well deserved as it > provides a lot of functionality) Certainly. > - digikamthemedesigner.manpage (missing manpage added by me) Great. > - Do not ship scalable icons (svgz): they just occupy space, but not used > (not sure what is debian's policy regarding this - I may also fix install > rule in upstream SVN as this currently work in progress - see [1]). That isn't a problem as far as debian policy goes. > I can commit the above changes to Debian SVN, but I cannot conclude on > final package until I resolve Ubuntu switch to pkg-kde-tools and probably > also icons changes upstream (I plan to do this in next couple of days). Great I look forward to your commits. > Anyway, I still hope that with final release (planned for March 8), we will > be able to just do sync from Debian instead of doing own package. I look forward to it ;-) Mark > [1] http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/digikam-devel/2009-February/026587.html
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.