[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Processed: [bts-link] source package kdemultimedia



Processing commands for control@bugs.debian.org:

> #
> # bts-link upstream status pull for source package kdemultimedia
> # see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/05/msg00001.html
> #
> user bts-link-upstream@lists.alioth.debian.org
Setting user to bts-link-upstream@lists.alioth.debian.org (was bts-link-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org).
> # remote status report for #237085
> #  * http://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=77200
> #  * remote status changed: NEW -> CLOSED
> #  * remote resolution changed: (?) -> UNMAINTAINED
> #  * closed upstream
> tags 237085 + fixed-upstream
Bug#237085: kdemultimedia-dev: aRts Control applet: Save spectrum analyzer on/off setting.
Tags were: upstream
Tags added: fixed-upstream

> usertags 237085 - status-NEW
Bug#237085: kdemultimedia-dev: aRts Control applet: Save spectrum analyzer on/off setting.
Usertags were: status-NEW.
Usertags are now: .
> usertags 237085 + status-CLOSED resolution-UNMAINTAINED
Bug#237085: kdemultimedia-dev: aRts Control applet: Save spectrum analyzer on/off setting.
There were no usertags set.
Usertags are now: resolution-UNMAINTAINED status-CLOSED.
> # remote status report for #237961
> #  * http://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=77580
> #  * remote status changed: NEW -> RESOLVED
> #  * remote resolution changed: (?) -> WONTFIX
> #  * upstream said bug is wontfix
> tags 237961 + upstream wontfix
Bug#237961: kmix isn't working with esd
Tags were: upstream
Tags added: upstream, wontfix

> usertags 237961 - status-NEW
Bug#237961: kmix isn't working with esd
Usertags were: status-NEW.
Usertags are now: .
> usertags 237961 + status-RESOLVED resolution-WONTFIX
Bug#237961: kmix isn't working with esd
There were no usertags set.
Usertags are now: resolution-WONTFIX status-RESOLVED.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


Reply to: