[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#464658: marked as done (Kgpg can't sign more than one file)



Your message dated Fri, 5 Sep 2008 18:11:02 +0200
with message-id <20080905161102.GA9072@ana.debian.net>
and subject line Re: Bug#464658: Kgpg can't sign more than one file
has caused the Debian Bug report #464658,
regarding Kgpg can't sign more than one file
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
464658: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=464658
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: kgpg
Version: 1.2.2

Multiple files can not be signed from the command line:

$ kgpg -e file1 file2 file3  (to encrypt) works great!

but

$ kgpg -S file1 file2 file3  (to sign) does not work.

I assume this is an oversight, as I can't imagine any reason to allow multiple encryption but prevent multiple signing. I think both should be allowed.

I am using Etch with KDE 3.


--


Thanks!

Lance W. Haverkamp
Lance@TheHaverkamps.net
Contact & encryption info:
http://thehaverkamps.net/?Lance:Contact_Me
<>< <>< <><






--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On Fri, Feb 08, 2008 at 05:25:44AM +0000, Lance W. Haverkamp wrote:
> Package: kgpg
> Version: 1.2.2
>
> Multiple files can not be signed from the command line:
>
> $ kgpg -e file1 file2 file3  (to encrypt) works great!
>
> but
>
> $ kgpg -S file1 file2 file3  (to sign) does not work.
>
> I assume this is an oversight, as I can't imagine any reason to allow  
> multiple encryption but prevent multiple signing.  I think both should  
> be allowed.
>
> I am using Etch with KDE 3.
>
>

You have this option implemented in KDE 4.1


--- End Message ---

Reply to: