Your message dated Wed, 20 Aug 2008 11:33:07 -0300 with message-id <200808201133.07683.perezmeyer@gmail.com> and subject line Re: Bug#495798: kuickshow: Feature request: minimum scaling factor has caused the Debian Bug report #495798, regarding kuickshow: Feature request: minimum scaling factor to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 495798: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=495798 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
- To: submit@bugs.debian.org
- Subject: kuickshow: Feature request: minimum scaling factor
- From: Tom Wright <tew24@esc.cam.ac.uk>
- Date: Wed, 20 Aug 2008 15:05:01 +0100
- Message-id: <[🔎] 200808201505.12950.tew24@esc.cam.ac.uk>
Package: kuickshow Version: 4:3.5.9-2 Severity: wishlist *** Please type your report below this line *** Kuickshow can automatically scale small images up to a given scale factor to make them more visible on the screen. What I'm suggesting is having an optional minimum scale factor, so that if an image can be scaled up by this minimum factor and still fit on the screen, it will be scaled as far as the screen size/maximum scale factor allow. If it cannot be scaled up by this minimum factor, it should be displayed 1:1. For example, if I have a 1024x768 screen a minimum scale factor of 3 and a maximum of 8, a 50x30 image would be scaled up to fill a space 400x240 pixels in size but a 640x480 image would be displayed at its actual size, 640x480 pixels. The idea is to make small images easy to see, but not make medium-sized ones look ugly with scaling artifacts or take up more screen space than they need to. Other solutions to this problem would be fine too, this is just one option. -- System Information: Debian Release: lenny/sid APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.25-2-686 (SMP w/1 CPU core) Locale: LANG=en_GB.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_GB.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Versions of packages kuickshow depends on: ii imlib11 1.9.15-7 Imlib is an imaging library for X ii kdelibs4c2a 4:3.5.9.dfsg.1-6 core libraries and binaries for al ii libc6 2.7-13 GNU C Library: Shared libraries ii libgcc1 1:4.3.1-8 GCC support library ii libqt3-mt 3:3.3.8b-5 Qt GUI Library (Threaded runtime v ii libstdc++6 4.3.1-8 The GNU Standard C++ Library v3 ii libx11-6 2:1.1.4-2 X11 client-side library kuickshow recommends no packages. Versions of packages kuickshow suggests: ii khelpcente 4:4.0.0.really.3.5.9.dfsg.1-5 help center for KDE -- no debconf informationAttachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
- To: Tom Wright <tew24@esc.cam.ac.uk>, 495798-done@bugs.debian.org
- Subject: Re: Bug#495798: kuickshow: Feature request: minimum scaling factor
- From: Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer <perezmeyer@gmail.com>
- Date: Wed, 20 Aug 2008 11:33:07 -0300
- Message-id: <200808201133.07683.perezmeyer@gmail.com>
- In-reply-to: <[🔎] 200808201505.12950.tew24@esc.cam.ac.uk>
- References: <[🔎] 200808201505.12950.tew24@esc.cam.ac.uk>
On Wednesday 20 August 2008 11:05:01 Tom Wright wrote: > Package: kuickshow > Version: 4:3.5.9-2 > Severity: wishlist > > *** Please type your report below this line *** > Kuickshow can automatically scale small images up to a given scale factor > to make them more visible on the screen. What I'm suggesting is having an > optional minimum scale factor, so that if an image can be scaled up by this > minimum factor and still fit on the screen, it will be scaled as far as the > screen size/maximum scale factor allow. If it cannot be scaled up by this > minimum factor, it should be displayed 1:1. > > For example, if I have a 1024x768 screen a minimum scale factor of 3 and a > maximum of 8, a 50x30 image would be scaled up to fill a space 400x240 > pixels in size but a 640x480 image would be displayed at its actual size, > 640x480 pixels. > > The idea is to make small images easy to see, but not make medium-sized > ones look ugly with scaling artifacts or take up more screen space than > they need to. > > Other solutions to this problem would be fine too, this is just one option. Tom: wishlist bugs like this should go directly to KDE's bugzilla. Anyway, kuickshow has reached Lenny's freeze, so even if upstream change it, we will not be able to put it in Lenny. More than that, once Lenny is out, KDE 3 will be replaced by KDE 4, in which kuickshow doesn't exists any more, leaving the place to gwenview (which you can also find in KDE 3). So, that's why I am closing this bug. If you think that it should not be closed, please feel free to re open it, but I will have to tag it as wontfix. Regards, Lisandro. -- <perrito666> SlackDeb: velo como un entrenamiento shaolin para geeks, en vez de meditación y tortura física, abstinencia de internet y sexo Horacio Francisco Sebastián "Perrito" Durán Barrionuevo, sobre un viaje que Federico "SlackDeb" Peretti estaba planeando con su novia. Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer http://perezmeyer.com.ar/ http://perezmeyer.blogspot.com/Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
--- End Message ---