Bug#488994: okular: Just installing Okular makes it produce "Could not find the Okular component."
Package: okular
Version: 4:4.0.84-1
Severity: important
I have about half of Debian's KDE4 installed on the system (still depending on
some KDE3 applications), and I couldn't upgrade everything when I installed
Okular today (GPRS and big upgrades are a big no-no).
However Okular didn't have strict dependencies on 4.0.84 KDE so I installed it
as is (installed just okular and libokular1).
When I start Okular from the console I get:
"Could not find the Okular component."
and a blank window titled Okular without any widgets, about 150x100 in
size.
Same if I pass a PDF file.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: lenny/sid
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (1000, 'testing'), (101, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.22-3-686 (SMP w/1 CPU core)
Locale: LANG=en_US, LC_CTYPE=en_US (charmap=ISO-8859-1)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Versions of packages okular depends on:
ii kdebase-runtime 4:4.0.82+svn819867-1 runtime components from the offici
ii kdelibs5 4:4.0.82+svn819867-1 core libraries for all KDE 4 appli
ii libc6 2.7-10 GNU C Library: Shared libraries
ii libfreetype6 2.3.6-1 FreeType 2 font engine, shared lib
ii libgcc1 1:4.3.1-2 GCC support library
ii libjpeg62 6b-14 The Independent JPEG Group's JPEG
ii libokularcore1 4:4.0.84-1 libraries for the Okular document
ii libpoppler-qt4-3 0.8.2-2 PDF rendering library (Qt 4 based
ii libqca2 2.0.0-4 libraries for the Qt Cryptographic
ii libqimageblitz4 1:0.0.4-4 QImageBlitz image effects library
ii libqt4-dbus 4.4.0-3 Qt 4 D-Bus module
ii libqt4-qt3support 4.4.0-3 Qt 3 compatibility library for Qt
ii libqt4-xml 4.4.0-3 Qt 4 XML module
ii libqtcore4 4.4.0-3 Qt 4 core module
ii libqtgui4 4.4.0-3 Qt 4 GUI module
ii libspectre1 0.2.0.ds-1 Library for rendering Postscript d
ii libstdc++6 4.3.1-2 The GNU Standard C++ Library v3
ii zlib1g 1:1.2.3.3.dfsg-12 compression library - runtime
okular recommends no packages.
-- no debconf information
Reply to: