getfem++_3.1-1_amd64.changes REJECTED
Hi Xavier,
so unfortunately, this reject will be more work:
- there seem to be more copyrights in superlu,
e.g. LAPACK stuff from the U of Tennessee.
Even if it doesn't have a copyright notice
in those files, it seems to me that the
LAPACK providence indicates that they own
the copyright.
- The license is the GNU Lesser General Public
License Version 2.1 or ....
(note the 2.1 for LGPL, not 2.0)
- On a minor note (nice to be fixed, but probably
not a reject): Please match the years
of the getfem copyright notices to those in the
files. Most of the people that show up with one
year in debian/copyright are credited for ranges
in the individual files.
Kind regards
T.
===
If you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if the
override file requires editing, reply to this email.
Reply to: