[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: kdelibs upload for #502459/kdelibs?



On Sat, Oct 25, 2008 at 02:32:23PM +0200, Raúl Sánchez Siles wrote:
> El Sábado 25 Octubre 2008, escribió:
> > On Fri, Oct 24, 2008 at 11:44:44PM +0200, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
> > > On Fri, Oct 24, 2008 at 07:16:29PM +0200, Ana Guerrero wrote:
> > > > Hola Moritz,
> > > >
> > > > On Fri, Oct 24, 2008 at 04:14:39PM +0200, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
> > > > > Hi,
> > > > > Would you mind if I upload a fix for #502459 for Lenny
> > > > > (using the upstream fix, not the workaround I posted earlier)?
> > > >
> > > > I have added you to the SVN, kde3 debian/ stuff is at:
> > > > pkg-kde/trunk/packages/<package>/debian
> > > >
> > > > There were some work going on for upload 3.5.10 feel free to revert it.
> > > >
> > > > Please coordinate with Raúl who has been working on this too.
> > > >
> > > > So, go ahead.  Thank you a lot.
> > >
> > > I've checked out the trunk and it already contains the Ebay crash fix.
> > >
> > > Raul, do you intend to push kdelibs 3.5.10 into Lenny? (Which seems
> > > sane to me given that it fixes some important bugs.) If so, what
> > > time frame are we talking about?
> >
> > It was me who was planning to upload 3.5.10, i can complete the changelog
> > with the changes if that helps. Then we can say lenny will be release with
> > kde 3.5.10 since it is what will appear for the users;)
> >
> > Ana
> 
> 
>   IMHO, kdelibs is quite complete for release now. There some things that 
> could already be done. For instance pushing upstream to solve some relevant 
> bugs we have in BTS or review kde bugzilla for any browsing problems.
> 
>   This would indeed require some time, I'll see what I can do, but I don't 
> have much unfortunately. I have tried so far to solve most severe bugs.
> 
>   BTW, those major bugs I think are solved in current svn are relevant to 
> people so I think an upload should be quite important, we can see later if 
> some minor changes can be further pushed into lenny, if time allows that.
> 
>   Changing slightly about topic. It's clear that the current version in svn is 
> 3.5.10 and that's the one we should provide in Lenny, IMHO again. My latest 
> build have been against the 3.5.10 tarball. No problem so far, this is no 
> surprise. The changelog is almost complete, but I'm sure that any llittle 
> piece that Ana can provide will be highly helpful.
> 
>   About me, well, I don't have DD powers, easy to understand since I'm not DD. 
> But I do have svn write permissions. So you can figure out what I'm able to 
> do. Thus Moritz, I think uploading is something where your help will be much 
> appreciated.
> 
>   If you need me for any changes, tests or anything else just ask.
>

I am going to try to complete the changelog, check everything is ok to push 
this into lenny, build and upload 3.5.10 to unstable.

But if i do not do this today/tomorrow, do not count on me doing it.

Ana


Reply to: