[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#465001: kexi: bashism in /bin/sh script



Package: kexi
Severity: important
Version: 1.6.3-4
User: debian-release@lists.debian.org
Usertags: goal-dash

Hello maintainer,

While performing an archive wide checkbashisms (from the 'devscripts' package) 
check I've found your package containing several /bin/sh scripts making 
use of a bashism.

checkbashisms' output:
> possible bashism in ./usr/bin/kexi_add_column_gui line 23 ('function' is
> useless): function setup_messages {
> possible bashism in ./usr/bin/kexi_delete_column line 21 ('function' is
> useless): function usage {
> possible bashism in ./usr/bin/kexi_delete_column line 38 ('function' is
> useless): function exit_with_error {
> possible bashism in ./usr/bin/kexi_delete_column line 45 ('function' is
> useless): function check {
> possible bashism in ./usr/bin/kexi_delete_column line 65 ('function' is
> useless): function prepare_new_create_table_statement {
> possible bashism in ./usr/bin/kexi_delete_column line 82 ('function' is
> useless): function get_sql_column_names {
> possible bashism in ./usr/bin/kexi_delete_column_gui line 23 ('function' is
> useless): function setup_messages {
> possible bashism in ./usr/bin/kexi_add_column line 21 ('function' is
> useless): function usage {
> possible bashism in ./usr/bin/kexi_add_column line 42 ('function' is
> useless): function exit_with_error {
> possible bashism in ./usr/bin/kexi_add_column line 49 ('function' is
> useless): function check {


Not using bash as /bin/sh would lead to errors. Please be aware that although 
bash is currently the default /bin/sh there's a release goal for Lenny to 
make dash the default /bin/sh[1].

If you want more information about dash as /bin/sh, you can read:
http://lists.debian.org/debian-release/2008/01/msg00189.html
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/DashAsBinSh

[1]http://release.debian.org/lenny/goals.txt

Thank you,
-- 
Atomo64 - Raphael

Please avoid sending me Word, PowerPoint or Excel attachments.
See http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/no-word-attachments.html



Reply to: