Your message dated Wed, 11 Apr 2007 01:50:11 +0200 with message-id <[🔎] 200704110150.17830.rasasi78@gmail.com> and subject line Retaking this bug. has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--- Begin Message ---
- To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>
- Subject: korganizer crashes at start
- From: Jan Christoph Uhde <UhdeJC@gmx.net>
- Date: Mon, 30 Aug 2004 01:07:40 +0200
- Message-id: <E1C1Ylx-0001pd-00@master.debian.org>
Package: korganizer Version: 4:3.3.0-2 Severity: important oberon@obi:/usr/lib$ korganizer korganizer: relocation error: /usr/lib/libkcal_resourceremote.so.1: undefined symbol: _ZNK4KCal16ResourceCalendar8infoTextEv oberon@obi:/usr/lib$ ll libkcal_re* -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 52K 2004-08-27 22:28 libkcal_resourceremote.a -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 1,4K 2004-08-27 21:23 libkcal_resourceremote.la lrwxr-xr-x 1 root root 31 2004-08-29 22:43 libkcal_resourceremote.so -> libkcal_resourceremote.so.1.0.0 lrwxr-xr-x 1 root root 40 2004-08-30 00:50 libkcal_resourceremote.so.1 -> /usr/lib/libkcal_resourceremote.so.1.0.0 -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 44K 2004-08-27 22:28 libkcal_resourceremote.so.1.0.0 -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.8.1 Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=de_DE@euro Versions of packages korganizer depends on: ii kdelibs4 4:3.3.0-1.1 KDE core libraries ii ktnef 4:3.3.0-2 KDE TNEF viewer ii libart-2.0-2 2.3.16-6 Library of functions for 2D graphi ii libc6 2.3.2.ds1-16 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an ii libgcc1 1:3.4.1-7 GCC support library ii libice6 4.3.0.dfsg.1-6 Inter-Client Exchange library ii libidn11 0.5.2-3 GNU libidn library, implementation ii libkcal2 4:3.3.0-2 KDE calendaring library ii libkdepim1 4:3.3.0-2 KDE PIM library ii libkgantt0 4:3.3.0-2 KDE gantt charting library ii libkpimexchange1 4:3.3.0-2 KDE PIM Exchange library ii libkpimidentities1 4:3.3.0-2 KDE PIM user identity information ii libpng12-0 1.2.5.0-7 PNG library - runtime ii libqt3c102-mt 3:3.3.3-4 Qt GUI Library (Threaded runtime v ii libsm6 4.3.0.dfsg.1-6 X Window System Session Management ii libstdc++5 1:3.3.4-9 The GNU Standard C++ Library v3 ii libx11-6 4.3.0.dfsg.1-6 X Window System protocol client li ii libxext6 4.3.0.dfsg.1-6 X Window System miscellaneous exte ii libxrender1 0.8.3-7 X Rendering Extension client libra ii perl 5.8.4-2 Larry Wall's Practical Extraction ii xlibs 4.3.0.dfsg.1-6 X Window System client libraries m ii zlib1g 1:1.2.1.1-7 compression library - runtime -- no debconf information
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
- To: 268943@bugs.debian.org
- Cc: 268943-submitter@bugs.debian.org, Frank Mehnert <fm3@os.inf.tu-dresden.de>, 268943-done@bugs.debian.org, control@bugs.debian.org
- Subject: Retaking this bug.
- From: Raúl Sánchez Siles <rasasi78@gmail.com>
- Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2007 01:50:11 +0200
- Message-id: <[🔎] 200704110150.17830.rasasi78@gmail.com>
notforwarded 268943 thanks Hello all: I think this bug has grown a little messy IMHO. We have two issues here. The first one reported by Jan Christoph Uhde which is related to some missing symbol on a library. There's another problem explained after, whose main reporter has been Frank Mehnert who was unable to make korganizer start for any reason. Apart from these, there is a reference to an upstream bug which IMHO doesn't correspond to first problem and more arguable than previous one, backtraces don't seem to match. So I propose the following actions: a) Closing this bug, I think it is solved since a long time ago. Jan Cristoph feel free to reopen if necessary. b) Frank I've been talking to some people and weren't unable to reproduce the bug, so please open a new bug an refresh the information if you still have the problem. c) Unlinking the bug with the proposed upstream bug. Thanks and regards. -- Raúl Sánchez Siles ----->Proud Debian user<----- Linux registered user #416098Attachment: pgpUFWRDlDKCl.pgp
Description: PGP signature
--- End Message ---