[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

gnome-ppp [paulus@samba.org: Re: [PATCH] Stop pmac_zilog from abusing 8250's device numbers.]



Try again, typo in the email addr.

--linas

   ----- The following addresses had permanent fatal errors -----
<debian-qt-kde@lists.dbian.org>
    (reason: 550 Host unknown)

To: v.djokic@gmail.com, porten@kde.org
Cc: debian-qt-kde@lists.dbian.org, zakame@spunge.org
Subject: gnome-ppp [paulus@samba.org: Re: [PATCH] Stop pmac_zilog from abusing 8250's device numbers.]
From: Linas Vepstas <linas@austin.ibm.com>


FYI,

A bug/feature in gnome-ppp and in kppp. There is a raging 100+ email 
thread on the powerpc linux kernel mailing list about serial ports.

--linas 

----- Forwarded message from Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org> -----

From: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
To: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Stop pmac_zilog from abusing 8250's device numbers.
Cc: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List <linuxppc-dev.ozlabs.org>
List-Archive: <http://ozlabs.org/pipermail/linuxppc-dev>
List-Post: <mailto:linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org>
List-Subscribe: <https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev>,
	<mailto:linuxppc-dev-request@ozlabs.org?subject=subscribe>

David Woodhouse writes:

> A GUI PPP dialer should be
> listing the available serial ports in the system whatever their names
> are.

How do you propose they do that?  Neither kppp nor gnome-ppp seem to
be able to do that currently.  Gnome-ppp offers just /dev/modem and
/dev/ttyS[0123].  Kppp offers those plus a whole pile of others, but
neither found the /dev/ttyPZ[01] that I get with your patch applied.
Gnome-ppp at least let me type in /dev/ttyPZ0, but kppp didn't seem to
have that facility.

> And nobody _forces_ you to use the name ttyPZ0. If you really want, you
> can call it ttyS0.... just mknod /dev/ttyS0 204 192

Sure I can do that, but that's beyond a non-technical user, who is
precisely the person who won't know (and shouldn't have to know) that
their computer has an 85C30 chip rather than a 16C550, or even what
those numbers refer to.

Paul.
_______________________________________________
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org
https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev

----- End forwarded message -----


----- End forwarded message -----



Reply to: