[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#306171: marked as done (konsole: fail to regain focus when hovering window disappear)

Your message dated Fri, 16 Feb 2007 23:58:35 +0100
with message-id <200702162358.35990.debian@pusling.com>
and subject line konsole: fail to regain focus when hovering window disappear
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--- Begin Message ---
Package: konsole
Version: 4:3.3.2-1
Severity: normal

*** Please type your report below this line ***

The konsole program fail to regain focus when it should.  I'm using
the 'focus over mouse' policy.  I'll try to explain the problem.

I start a konsole, and use it as normal.  Next, I for example start
xine (or some other program, using xine as an example), and places the
window over the konsole window.  I place the mouse over both the xine
window and the konsole window, and then press 'q' to exit xine.  At
this point, the focus is back in the konsole window, but it isn't
accepting keypresses.  I have to move the mouse out of the konsole
window, and back in again, before konsole will accept keypresses.

This do not happen for every film I play using xine.  And it does not
happen for all programs.  I've been able to reproduce it using the
film available from

Start a konsole, run
'xine http://www.nuug.no/pub/video/published/20040819-minipc-medium.mpeg'
and place the video window over the konsole.  Next, press 'q' to exit
xine and try to use [enter] in the konsole.  It does not work.

-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (2100, 'testing')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.8-2-686
Locale: LANG=no_NO, LC_CTYPE=no_NO (charmap=ISO-8859-1)

Versions of packages konsole depends on:
ii  kdelibs4             4:3.3.2-4.0.2       KDE core libraries
ii  libart-2.0-2         2.3.17-1            Library of functions for 2D graphi
ii  libc6                2.3.2.ds1-20        GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
ii  libfam0c102          2.7.0-6             client library to control the FAM
ii  libgcc1              1:3.4.3-12          GCC support library
ii  libice6              4.3.0.dfsg.1-12.0.1 Inter-Client Exchange library
ii  libidn11             0.5.13-1.0          GNU libidn library, implementation
ii  libpng12-0           1.2.8rel-1          PNG library - runtime
ii  libqt3c102-mt        3:3.3.4-2           Qt GUI Library (Threaded runtime v
ii  libsm6               4.3.0.dfsg.1-12.0.1 X Window System Session Management
ii  libstdc++5           1:3.3.5-8           The GNU Standard C++ Library v3
ii  libx11-6             4.3.0.dfsg.1-12.0.1 X Window System protocol client li
ii  libxext6             4.3.0.dfsg.1-12.0.1 X Window System miscellaneous exte
ii  libxrender1          0.8.3-7             X Rendering Extension client libra
ii  libxtst6             4.3.0.dfsg.1-12.0.1 X Window System event recording an
ii  xlibs                4.3.0.dfsg.1-12     X Keyboard Extension (XKB) configu
ii  zlib1g               1:1.2.2-3           compression library - runtime

-- no debconf information

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On Thursday 11 January 2007, Sune Vuorela wrote:

> I have tried reproducing it according to your description, but I can't. As
> it is a quite old bug, there is a big chance that it is fixed - are you
> still able to reproduce it?

No reply - closing.
How could I receive from the cache?

First of all from the control panel menu inside Netscape you never need to 
ping the sendmail for connecting a DVD site.

Attachment: pgpAvQ7Zsf7UX.pgp
Description: PGP signature

--- End Message ---

Reply to: