[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#349972: marked as done (kdeprinter prints empty landscape pages when converting from text)

Your message dated Fri, 16 Feb 2007 23:15:13 +0100
with message-id <2007021623151342@ekaia.org>
and subject line Closing bug 349972
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--- Begin Message ---
Package: kdeprint
Version: 4:3.5.0-4

When I use 'more file.txt | kdeprint' and print to cups defined printer in
portrait mode, I am asked for coversion to known format. If I convert it,
everything works fine.

When I use the same command, but choose landscape paper orientation, empty
page is printed.

The workaround is not to use convert function and keep raw fromat. The
page is printed correctly.

I am using uptodate unstable distribution.

The printer is(from printer.ppd):

*% Product Version Information
*Product: "(HP LaserJet 4100 Series )"
*ModelName: "HP LaserJet 4100 Series "
*ShortNickName: "HP LaserJet 4100 Series "
*NickName:  "HP LaserJet 4100 Series v.3010.107 Postscript (recommended)"
*PSVersion: "(3010.107) 0"
*Manufacturer: "HP"

Cupsys is version 1.1.23-15

Kind regards,

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Submitter was asked to provide more information about this bug
( http://bugs.debian.org/349972 ) four weeks ago.

Since more info was not provided, we are closing the bug.
Feel free to reopen this bug if you are still experiencing this issue
and you have extra information on how reproduce the issue.

Ana Guerrero,
  on behalf of the Debian Qt/KDE team

--- End Message ---

Reply to: