[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#342215: kmail crashes very oftenly on SPARC (other KDE apps crash too, but not so often)



severity 342215 important
stop

OK, until we get some reasonable confirmation that the bug is still 
present, I'm lowering to 'important'.

Cheers,
Christopher Martin

On Sunday 23 July 2006 18:23, you wrote:
> Sorry, but can't test at this moment. To upgrade to that version, I
> would have to update to xorg, which is broken for SPARC. :-(
>
> On Sun, 23 Jul 2006 11:36:15 -0400, Christopher Martin 
<chrsmrtn@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Can you confirm that the crashes you reported still afflict the
> > latest KDE 3.5.3? It's been seven months since the report, and
> > we've had no other reports of KMail crashes on sparc since.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Christopher Martin
> >
> >> Since I upgraded KDE to 3.4.x, I'm getting unpleasant crashes on
> >> various KDE applications but the most serious, because of the
> >> frecuency in which it happens is kmail.
> >>
> >> The worst part is that, as kmail is compiled without debuging
> >> symbols, I can't debug much on what's happening, and all I have
> >> are the signals with which it dies (4 "Illegal Instruction", and
> >> 11 "Invalid memory reference").
> >>
> >> *** KMail got signal 11 (Crashing)
> >> KCrash: Application 'kmail' crashing...
> >>
> >> And this doesn't happen when doing something especifically. For
> >> example, if I type to fast when composing, it sometimes crashes.
> >> Also I got crashes when configuring kmail or filters.
> >>
> >> Just a moment ago konsole died with no reason, and I wasn't even
> >> doing anything with it.
> >>
> >> KCrash: Application 'konsole' crashing...
> >>
> >> This is very annoying.
>
> --
> ---------------------------------------------------------
> Lic. Martín Marqués         |   SELECT 'mmarques' ||
> Centro de Telemática        |       '@' || 'unl.edu.ar';
> Universidad Nacional        |   DBA, Programador,
>     del Litoral             |   Administrador
> ---------------------------------------------------------



Reply to: