[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#378763: admin/cvs.sh: No support for autoconf-2.6



Package: kapptemplate
Version: 4:3.5.2-1
Severity: important
Tags: patch

kapptemplate creates KDE projects which do no support autoconf-2.6,
because admin/cvs.sh does not correctly check for autoconf-2.6. Please
find the attached patch which should be applied to
kapptemplate/admin/cvs.sh

Thanks,
Michael

-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (300, 'experimental')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.17.6
Locale: LANG=de_DE.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=de_DE.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)

kapptemplate depends on no packages.

Versions of packages kapptemplate recommends:
ii  automake1.4 [automaken]      1:1.4-p6-11 A tool for generating GNU Standard
ii  automake1.7 [automaken]      1.7.9-9     A tool for generating GNU Standard
ii  automake1.8 [automaken]      1.8.5-5     A tool for generating GNU Standard
ii  automake1.9 [automaken]      1.9.6-5     A tool for generating GNU Standard
ii  kdelibs4-dev                 4:3.5.3-1   development files for the KDE core

-- no debconf information
Index: admin/cvs.sh
===================================================================
--- admin/cvs.sh	(revisión: 857)
+++ admin/cvs.sh	(copia de trabajo)
@@ -29,7 +29,7 @@
 {
 AUTOCONF_VERSION=`$AUTOCONF --version | head -n 1`
 case $AUTOCONF_VERSION in
-  Autoconf*2.5* | autoconf*2.5* ) : ;;
+  Autoconf*2.5* | autoconf*2.5* | Autoconf*2.6* | autoconf*2.6* ) : ;;
   "" )
     echo "*** AUTOCONF NOT FOUND!."
     echo "*** KDE requires autoconf 2.52, 2.53 or 2.54"
@@ -44,7 +44,7 @@
  
 AUTOHEADER_VERSION=`$AUTOHEADER --version | head -n 1`
 case $AUTOHEADER_VERSION in
-  Autoconf*2.5* | autoheader*2.5* ) : ;;
+  Autoconf*2.5* | autoheader*2.5* | Autoconf*2.6* | autoheader*2.6* ) : ;;
   "" )
     echo "*** AUTOHEADER NOT FOUND!."
     echo "*** KDE requires autoheader 2.52 or 2.53 (part of autoconf)"

Reply to: