Bug#304801: kdeprint: Problem still on Sid
Package: kdeprint
Version: 4:3.5.5a.dfsg.1-2
Followup-For: Bug #304801
I get this problem for each and every printer/document, this being on up2date Sid.
I get that type of error :
--------
Un problème d'impression est survenu. Le message d'erreur émis par le système est :
Impossible de démarrer le processus d'impression. Vérifiez la syntaxe de la commande : cupsdoprint -P
'EPFL-ELD020-HPIJS' -J 'essai.txt' -H 'localhost:631' -U 'didier' -o ' copies=1
multiple-document-handling=separate-documents-collated-copies orientation-requested=3'
--------
(Sorry for french...)
BUT, when I try to copy-paste the command in any console (being Yakuake for instance), I get this :
----
$ cupsdoprint -P 'EPFL-ELD020-HPIJS' -J 'essai.txt' -H 'localhost:631' -U 'didier' -o ' copies=1
multiple-document-handling=separate-documents-collated-copies orientation-requested=3'
This utility doesn't support printing from STDIN.
----
So, what could I do to help resolving that problem ?
Regards,
Didier
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 4.0
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.18-2-686
Locale: LANG=fr_CH.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=fr_CH.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Versions of packages kdeprint depends on:
ii enscript 1.6.4-11 Converts ASCII text to Postscript,
ii kdelibs4c2a 4:3.5.5a.dfsg.1-5 core libraries and binaries for al
ii libc6 2.3.6.ds1-8 GNU C Library: Shared libraries
ii libgcc1 1:4.1.1-20 GCC support library
ii libqt3-mt 3:3.3.7-1 Qt GUI Library (Threaded runtime v
ii libstdc++6 4.1.1-20 The GNU Standard C++ Library v3
ii poster 1:19990428-8 Create large posters out of PostSc
ii psutils 1.17-24 A collection of PostScript documen
Versions of packages kdeprint recommends:
ii gs-esp [postscript-viewe 8.15.3.dfsg.1-1 The Ghostscript PostScript interpr
ii gs-gpl [postscript-viewe 8.54.dfsg.1-5 The GPL Ghostscript PostScript int
ii kghostview [postscript-v 4:3.5.5-2 PostScript viewer for KDE
-- no debconf information
Reply to: