[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#394953: qt4-x11_4.2.1-1(hppa/unstable): FTBFS: missing defines

On Tue, Oct 24, 2006 at 12:07:42PM -0400, Brian Nelson wrote:
> lamont@debian.org writes:
> > How about using the system inotify syscall numbers and such instead of
> > private ones???
> Ehhh, I don't know why they do that.  Maybe so that they can verify that
> those arches work first?  Who knows...

Actually, I expect that it's a leftover from when inotify wasn't found
in the headers everywhere yet.


Reply to: