Le Jeu 25 Mai 2006 22:30, Filipus Klutiero a écrit : > Brian Nelson a écrit : > >Isn't an ICE always a compiler bug? > > Yes, I was just asking if it was a new bug or a pre-existing one. > > > In any case, nothing in the Qt code > >changed between -1 and -2, so it's certainly a GCC regression. > > Thanks for the information...I guess that's bad news. It seems there > are almost 2 monthes of changes in the gcc 4.0 branch between 4.0.3-1 > and 4.0.3-3, so it's quite possible that it's indeed a GCC > regression. When looking at the gcc-4.0 bugs reported in Debian's BTS > for > 4.0.3-1, I can't see much that would explain this. > I'm completely clueless about building, but somebody should start by > figuring which GCC regression is blocking this. Given the fact that > branch 4.0 looks very inactive, maybe the easiest thing would be to > identify the changeset which introduced this regression. one can also try to compile it with gcc 4.1 -- ·O· Pierre Habouzit ··O madcoder@debian.org OOO http://www.madism.org
Attachment:
pgp4gxKGpf6_6.pgp
Description: PGP signature