[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#356506: marked as done (libqt3-mt: Please add support for some more XF86 keys)



Your message dated Fri, 12 May 2006 09:16:08 -0400
with message-id <200605120916.09358.chrsmrtn@debian.org>
and subject line libqt3-mt: Please add support for some more XF86 keys
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--- Begin Message ---
Package: libqt3-mt
Version: 3:3.3.5-4.0
Severity: wishlist

Hi,

X.org's header files define some more XF86 keys for keyboards with keys
for Copy/Paste/Cut and also for Undo/Redo. I created a patch against
qt-x11 that adds support for these keys and also adds the needes keys to
the Qt::Key. It would be nice if the patches could be included in
Debians qt-packages so I don't need to rebuilt Qt everytime an update
arrives. Also this is needed as base for making KDE recognize the extra
keys, which is the real goal for me and I also have a patch for that,
I'll submit a wishlist bug as soon as I know wether the qt-patch will
get in sometime.

I'm not sure wether this breaks BC, so if it does please let me know and
close this bugreport. I don't want to break BC only to support my
keyboard.

Andreas

-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (990, 'unstable'), (500, 'experimental'), (500, 'testing'), (500, 'stable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.15.5-cherry
Locale: LANG=de_DE.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=de_DE.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)

Versions of packages libqt3-mt depends on:
ii  fontconfig                2.3.2-5        generic font configuration library
ii  libaudio2                 1.7-5          The Network Audio System (NAS). (s
ii  libc6                     2.3.6-3        GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
ii  libfontconfig1            2.3.2-5        generic font configuration library
ii  libfreetype6              2.1.10-1.1     FreeType 2 font engine, shared lib
ii  libgcc1                   1:4.0.3-1      GCC support library
ii  libice6                   6.9.0.dfsg.1-4 Inter-Client Exchange library
ii  libjpeg62                 6b-12          The Independent JPEG Group's JPEG 
ii  libmng1                   1.0.8-1        Multiple-image Network Graphics li
ii  libpng12-0                1.2.8rel-5     PNG library - runtime
ii  libsm6                    6.9.0.dfsg.1-4 X Window System Session Management
ii  libstdc++6                4.0.3-1        The GNU Standard C++ Library v3
ii  libx11-6                  6.9.0.dfsg.1-4 X Window System protocol client li
ii  libxcursor1               1.1.3-1        X cursor management library
ii  libxext6                  6.9.0.dfsg.1-4 X Window System miscellaneous exte
ii  libxft2                   2.1.8.2-3      FreeType-based font drawing librar
ii  libxi6                    6.9.0.dfsg.1-4 X Window System Input extension li
ii  libxinerama1              6.9.0.dfsg.1-4 X Window System multi-head display
ii  libxrandr2                6.9.0.dfsg.1-4 X Window System Resize, Rotate and
ii  libxrender1               1:0.9.0.2-1    X Rendering Extension client libra
ii  libxt6                    6.9.0.dfsg.1-4 X Toolkit Intrinsics
ii  zlib1g                    1:1.2.3-11     compression library - runtime

libqt3-mt recommends no packages.

-- no debconf information


--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
I can't promise I'd add your patch, but if you want you can submit it. 
Best to talk to upstream Qt first, though.

Since your message said that you'd file a new report with the actual 
patch, I'm closing this bug until then. Thanks!

--- End Message ---

Reply to: