[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#350589: Superkaramba shouldn't depend on XMMS



On Thursday 02 February 2006 08:49, you wrote:
> El Jueves, 2 de Febrero de 2006 01:46, Christopher Martin escribió:
> > On Monday 30 January 2006 11:16, Iñaki wrote:
> > > Package: superkaramba
> > > Version: 4:3.5.1-1
> > >
> > > Superkaramba in Debian depends on XMMS, but this dependencia is not
> > > necessary and doesn't allow me to desinstall GTK in my computer.
> >
> > Superkaramba can either be built with or without XMMS support. If it
> > built with XMMS support, then Superkaramba will not start at all
> > without XMMS being installed, due to unresolved symbols. So we can't
> > simply lower XMMS from a dependency to a Suggests - we'd have to
> > completely disable XMMS support.
>
> Ok, and could be possible an independent package "superkaramba-xmms" that
> add XMMS support to superkaramba installed package?
>
> If it is possible the "superkaramba-xmms" could be a suggested package
> for superkaramba and it will depend on XMMS. In this case KDE users don't
> need XMMS installed to enjoy superkaramba.
>
> For example, Kubuntu by default doesn't include Gtk libraries, but if you
> want to install supekaramba there appear too much dependences because
> XMSS and Gtk.

Unfortunately, superkaramba is comprised of only one 
binary, /usr/bin/superkaramba, so we can't split out XMMS support into a 
separate package (if it were possible, we'd definitely do it).

For now, keeping XMMS support is probably a good idea, since XMMS is still a 
popular package. But it is declining in popularity, and perhaps when KDE4 
is uploaded post-Etch we'll finally disable it. Until then, you'll have to 
have XMMS if you want superkaramba. But XMMS and gtk-1.2 don't take up much 
space, and the Menu Editor can be used to remove XMMS from the KDE menu, so 
it shouldn't really be a problem for users.

Cheers,
Christopher Martin

Attachment: pgpxJAG5S9aH0.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Reply to: