Bug#326836: libqt3-mt: QProgressBar not properly built into QT?

[Adeodato Simó <asp16@alu.ua.es>]

* Scott M. Likens [Mon, 05 Sep 2005 20:06:23 -0700]:

> Package: libqt3-mt
> Version: 3:3.3.4-7
> Severity: normal

> /usr/bin/ld: warning: libstdc++.so.5, needed by /usr/lib/libfam.so, may
> conflict with libstdc++.so.6
> ../../amarok/src/statusbar/.libs/libstatusbar.a(progressBar.o): In
> function `KDE::ProgressBar::~ProgressBar()':
> progressBar.cpp:(.text+0xd18): undefined reference to
> `QProgressBar::~QProgressBar()'
> ../../amarok/src/statusbar/.libs/libstatusbar.a(progressBar.o): In
> function `KDE::ProgressBar::~ProgressBar()':
> progressBar.cpp:(.text+0x1108): undefined reference to
> `QProgressBar::~QProgressBar()'
> ../../amarok/src/statusbar/.libs/libstatusbar.a(progressBar.o): In
> function `KDE::ProgressBar::~ProgressBar()':
> progressBar.cpp:(.text+0x14f8): undefined reference to
> `QProgressBar::~QProgressBar()'

> Attempting to build amaroK for KDE with custom things, results in this.

> Note QProgressBar is related to libqt-mt and running amarok 1.3.1

  Do you mean, you're building the amarok 1.3.1-1 Debian source package
  with some modifications? How are you doing it? Or are you building
  from the original tarball?

  If you're not using debuild or dpkg-buildpackage or debian/rules
  build, and are running ./configure and make by hand over the debian
  source package, beware of patches/no_libadd_in_convenience_libs.diff.

  Please write back so we know what to do with this bug.

  Cheers,

-- 
Adeodato Simó
    EM: asp16 [ykwim] alu.ua.es | PK: DA6AE621
 
I try to keep an open mind, but not so open that my brains fall out.