Bug#307261: marked as done (kmail: IMAP email is lost when using spam filter)
Your message dated Mon, 2 May 2005 01:14:34 -0700
with message-id <20050502081430.GB8314@mauritius.dodds.net>
and subject line Bug#307261: This bug can be closed.
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 2 May 2005 07:18:32 +0000
>From steve@newportit.com Mon May 02 00:18:32 2005
Return-path: <steve@newportit.com>
Received: from uml.newportit.com [207.44.185.51]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DSVCK-0003TI-00; Mon, 02 May 2005 00:18:32 -0700
Received: (qmail 13137 invoked by uid 516); 2 May 2005 07:18:31 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO ?192.168.0.2?) (69.230.94.18)
by 0 with SMTP; 2 May 2005 07:18:31 -0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Steve Freitas <steve@newportit.com>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>
Subject: kmail: IMAP email is lost when using spam filter
X-Mailer: reportbug 3.10
Date: Mon, 02 May 2005 00:18:27 -0700
Message-Id: <[🔎] E1DSVCK-0003TI-00@spohr.debian.org>
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level:
Package: kmail
Version: 4:3.3.2-3
Severity: critical
Justification: causes serious data loss
On my IMAP server, I created a subfolder under INBOX titled "Spam". I
then started the anti-spam wizard, in which I told it to utilize the
spamassassin installation it found on my system. I told it "Classify
messages using the anti-spam tools", and "Move detected spam messages to
the selected folder." I selected the newly created "Spam" folder on my
IMAP server. I then selected a day's worth of email and did Apply
Filters, which caused it all to disappear. It was purged from the IMAP
server, and as far as I can tell, it's just gone. I've checked all local
and IMAP folders with no luck.
I've done no configuration of my system's spamassassin installation.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.9-stu1
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968)
Versions of packages kmail depends on:
ii kdelibs4 4:3.3.2-5 KDE core libraries
ii libc6 2.3.2.ds1-21 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
ii libgcc1 1:3.4.3-12 GCC support library
ii libice6 4.3.0.dfsg.1-12.0.1 Inter-Client Exchange library
ii libkcal2a 4:3.3.2-3 KDE calendaring library
ii libkdenetwork2 4:3.3.2-3 KDE Network library
ii libkdepim1 4:3.3.2-3 KDE PIM library
ii libkleopatra0a 4:3.3.2-3 KDE GnuPG interface libraries
ii libkpimidentities1 4:3.3.2-3 KDE PIM user identity information
ii libksieve0 4:3.3.2-3 KDE mail/news message filtering li
ii libmimelib1a 4:3.3.2-3 KDE mime library
ii libpng12-0 1.2.8rel-1 PNG library - runtime
ii libqt3c102-mt 3:3.3.4-3 Qt GUI Library (Threaded runtime v
ii libsm6 4.3.0.dfsg.1-12.0.1 X Window System Session Management
ii libstdc++5 1:3.3.5-12 The GNU Standard C++ Library v3
ii libx11-6 4.3.0.dfsg.1-12.0.1 X Window System protocol client li
ii libxext6 4.3.0.dfsg.1-12.0.1 X Window System miscellaneous exte
ii perl 5.8.4-8 Larry Wall's Practical Extraction
ii xlibs 4.3.0.dfsg.1-12 X Keyboard Extension (XKB) configu
ii zlib1g 1:1.2.2-4 compression library - runtime
-- no debconf information
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 307261-done) by bugs.debian.org; 2 May 2005 08:14:35 +0000
>From vorlon@debian.org Mon May 02 01:14:35 2005
Return-path: <vorlon@debian.org>
Received: from dsl093-039-086.pdx1.dsl.speakeasy.net (localhost.localdomain) [66.93.39.86]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DSW4Z-0000XH-00; Mon, 02 May 2005 01:14:35 -0700
Received: by localhost.localdomain (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id C624D172843; Mon, 2 May 2005 01:14:34 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Mon, 2 May 2005 01:14:34 -0700
From: Steve Langasek <vorlon@debian.org>
To: Steve Freitas <steve@newportit.com>, 307261-done@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Re: Bug#307261: This bug can be closed.
Message-ID: <20050502081430.GB8314@mauritius.dodds.net>
References: <[🔎] 200505020046.15606.steve@newportit.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="NMuMz9nt05w80d4+"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <[🔎] 200505020046.15606.steve@newportit.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040907i
Delivered-To: 307261-done@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level:
--NMuMz9nt05w80d4+
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Mon, May 02, 2005 at 12:46:15AM -0700, Steve Freitas wrote:
> Sorry about that -- a couple of my filters were having an unexpected=20
> interaction, and Kmail's behavior was as designed. D'oh! :-\
Closing, per submitter feedback.
Thanks,
--=20
Steve Langasek
postmodern programmer
--NMuMz9nt05w80d4+
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature
Content-Disposition: inline
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFCdeFmKN6ufymYLloRAg6rAJ44Y4l5x/hKCFQHrwDVwKf2SvNyjQCgussh
HWZwPlAvk9AHvqbBZJ+1G94=
=Qb1N
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--NMuMz9nt05w80d4+--
Reply to: