[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#244388: marked as done (/usr/bin/kwrite: Unindent is not fine any mor)



Your message dated Sun, 06 Mar 2005 16:39:16 +0100
with message-id <1110123556.1727.39.camel@desktop>
and subject line accidental duplication
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 18 Apr 2004 09:48:10 +0000
>From bensmail@gmx.net Sun Apr 18 02:48:10 2004
Return-path: <bensmail@gmx.net>
Received: from 20.32.204.212.ediscom.de (benjamin) [212.204.32.20] 
	by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
	id 1BF8uI-0001If-00; Sun, 18 Apr 2004 02:48:10 -0700
Received: from ben by benjamin with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian))
	id 1BF8ul-0000QX-00; Sun, 18 Apr 2004 11:48:39 +0200
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Benjamin Mesing <bensmail@gmx.net>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>
Subject: /usr/bin/kwrite: Unindent is not fine any mor
X-Mailer: reportbug 2.36
Date: Sun, 18 Apr 2004 11:48:39 +0200
Message-Id: <E1BF8ul-0000QX-00@benjamin>
Sender: Benjamin Mesing <ben@benjamin>
X-BadReturnPath: ben@benjamin rewritten as bensmail@gmx.net
  using "From" header
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 
	(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-7.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
	autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level: 
X-CrossAssassin-Score: 1

Package: kate
Version: 4:3.2.1-1
Severity: wishlist
File: /usr/bin/kwrite

If I have the following situation:
{
	int a=0;
//	a+=5;
	cerr << a <<endl;
}
now I want to remove the braces. If I mark anything and try to unindent this does not 
work any longer because the comment blocks this. I really preferred the former 
behaviour of the indentation. It could be also used to format text I copied from 
somewhere which was indented with spaces.

Greetings Ben

-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux benjamin 2.6.5 #1 Wed Apr 14 19:00:38 CEST 2004 i686
Locale: LANG=en_IE@euro, LC_CTYPE=de_DE@euro (ignored: LC_ALL set to en_IE@euro)

Versions of packages kate depends on:
ii  kdelibs4                    4:3.2.2-1    KDE core libraries
ii  libart-2.0-2                2.3.16-1     Library of functions for 2D graphi
ii  libc6                       2.3.2.ds1-11 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
ii  libfam0c102                 2.6.10-6     client library to control the FAM 
ii  libgcc1                     1:3.3.3-2    GCC support library
ii  libice6                     4.3.0-2      Inter-Client Exchange library
ii  libpng12-0                  1.2.5.0-4    PNG library - runtime
ii  libqt3c102-mt               3:3.2.3-2    Qt GUI Library (Threaded runtime v
ii  libsm6                      4.3.0-2      X Window System Session Management
ii  libstdc++5                  1:3.3.3-2    The GNU Standard C++ Library v3
ii  libx11-6                    4.3.0-2      X Window System protocol client li
ii  libxext6                    4.3.0-2      X Window System miscellaneous exte
ii  libxrender1                 0.8.2-1      X Rendering Extension client libra
ii  xlibs                       4.3.0-2      X Window System client libraries m
ii  zlib1g                      1:1.2.1-3    compression library - runtime

-- no debconf information


---------------------------------------
Received: (at 244388-done) by bugs.debian.org; 6 Mar 2005 15:39:50 +0000
>From bensmail@gmx.net Sun Mar 06 07:39:50 2005
Return-path: <bensmail@gmx.net>
Received: from pop.gmx.de (mail.gmx.net) [213.165.64.20] 
	by spohr.debian.org with smtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
	id 1D7xrC-0002qJ-00; Sun, 06 Mar 2005 07:39:50 -0800
Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 06 Mar 2005 15:39:19 -0000
Received: from unknown (EHLO [212.204.39.239]) (212.204.39.239)
  by mail.gmx.net (mp008) with SMTP; 06 Mar 2005 16:39:19 +0100
X-Authenticated: #834378
Subject: accidental duplication
From: Benjamin Mesing <bensmail@gmx.net>
To: 244388-done@bugs.debian.org
Content-Type: text/plain
Date: Sun, 06 Mar 2005 16:39:16 +0100
Message-Id: <1110123556.1727.39.camel@desktop>
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Evolution 2.0.3 
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0
Delivered-To: 244388-done@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
	(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no 
	version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level: 

I've reported that bug twice. The other report for this is #244391.



Reply to: