Bug#123535: marked as done (konqueror inserts line breaks where there's no whitespace)
Your message dated Sun, 16 Jan 2005 21:03:18 -0500
with message-id <200501162103.24654.christopher.martin@utoronto.ca>
and subject line Bug no longer relevant, so closing
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 11 Dec 2001 21:30:44 +0000
>From apenwarr@nit.ca Tue Dec 11 15:30:44 2001
Return-path: <apenwarr@nit.ca>
Received: from modemcable052.102-200-24.mtl.mc.videotron.ca (insight.nit.ca) [24.200.102.52]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 16DuU8-0006XD-00; Tue, 11 Dec 2001 15:30:44 -0600
Received: from apenwarr by insight.nit.ca with local (Exim 3.32 #1 (Debian))
id 16DuTx-0004QZ-00; Tue, 11 Dec 2001 16:30:33 -0500
From: apenwarr@nit.ca
Subject: konqueror inserts line breaks where there's no whitespace
To: submit@bugs.debian.org
X-Mailer: bug 3.3.10
Message-Id: <E16DuTx-0004QZ-00@insight.nit.ca>
Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2001 16:30:33 -0500
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org
Package: konqueror
Version: 4:2.2.2-7
Severity: normal
Hi,
Konqueror sometimes inserts blank lines between text and images, even though
there's no whitespace between the text and the img tag. I'm attaching a
sample html file below; you can also view a sample at:
http://nit.ca/~apenwarr/konq-bug/
In the sample, the second column should appear all on one line, but
konqueror splits it into three lines instead. This has been true since at
least konqueror 2.1, and maybe forever.
Thanks,
Avery
<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/loose.dtd";>
<html>
<body>
<table width=100%>
<tr>
<td width=100%>This is some text!</td>
<td>[<img src="up.gif" alt="x">]</td>
</tr>
</table>
</body>
</html>
-- System Information
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Kernel Version: Linux insight 2.4.9 #1 Thu Nov 1 23:29:21 EST 2001 i686 unknown
Versions of the packages konqueror depends on:
ii kdebase-libs 2.2.2-7 KDE libraries and modules for kdebase
ii kdelibs3 2.2.2-5 KDE core libraries (runtime files)
ii lesstif1 0.92.26-1 OSF/Motif implementation released under LGPL
ii libarts 2.2.2-5 aRts Sound system
ii libc6 2.2.4-4 GNU C Library: Shared libraries and Timezone
ii libjpeg62 6b-1.3 The Independent JPEG Group's JPEG runtime li
ii libkonq3 2.2.2-7 Core libraries for KDE's file manager
ii libpng2 1.0.12-2 PNG library - runtime
ii libqt2 2.3.1-15 Qt GUI Library (runtime version).
ii libstdc++2.10- 2.95.4-0.01082 The GNU stdc++ library
ii xlibs 4.1.0-6 X Window System client libraries
ii zlib1g 1.1.3-15 compression library - runtime
libarts-alsa Not installed or no info
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 123535-done) by bugs.debian.org; 17 Jan 2005 02:03:30 +0000
>From christopher.martin@utoronto.ca Sun Jan 16 18:03:30 2005
Return-path: <christopher.martin@utoronto.ca>
Received: from tomts25-srv.bellnexxia.net [209.226.175.188]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1CqMEo-0002G9-00; Sun, 16 Jan 2005 18:03:26 -0800
Received: from [192.168.0.100] ([70.49.17.55])
by tomts25-srv.bellnexxia.net
(InterMail vM.5.01.06.10 201-253-122-130-110-20040306) with ESMTP
id <20050117020322.SUTX25979.tomts25-srv.bellnexxia.net@[192.168.0.100]>;
Sun, 16 Jan 2005 21:03:22 -0500
From: Christopher Martin <christopher.martin@utoronto.ca>
Reply-To: Christopher Martin <christopher.martin@utoronto.ca>
To: 89622-done@bugs.debian.org,
107756-done@bugs.debian.org,
116585-done@bugs.debian.org,
121344-done@bugs.debian.org,
121933-done@bugs.debian.org,
123535-done@bugs.debian.org,
131545-done@bugs.debian.org,
145376-done@bugs.debian.org,
156949-done@bugs.debian.org,
193124-done@bugs.debian.org,
201189-done@bugs.debian.org,
203709-done@bugs.debian.org,
219906-done@bugs.debian.org,
237042-done@bugs.debian.org,
243956-done@bugs.debian.org,
253700-done@bugs.debian.org,
180352-done@bugs.debian.org,
194398-done@bugs.debian.org,
196679-done@bugs.debian.org,
196723-done@bugs.debian.org,
197369-done@bugs.debian.org,
197425-done@bugs.debian.org,
198152-done@bugs.debian.org,
198306-done@bugs.debian.org,
200314-done@bugs.debian.org,
202685-done@bugs.debian.org,
205009-done@bugs.debian.org,
207556-done@bugs.debian.org,
209305-done@bugs.debian.org,
211542-done@bugs.debian.org,
212925-done@bugs.debian.org,
216073-done@bugs.debian.org,
216929-done@bugs.debian.org,
217300-done@bugs.debian.org,
217717-done@bugs.debian.org,
222662-done@bugs.debian.org,
227199-done@bugs.debian.org,
231688-done@bugs.debian.org,
232501-done@bugs.debian.org,
234111-done@bugs.debian.org,
234656-done@bugs.debian.org,
238813-done@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Bug no longer relevant, so closing
Date: Sun, 16 Jan 2005 21:03:18 -0500
User-Agent: KMail/1.7.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-Id: <200501162103.24654.christopher.martin@utoronto.ca>
Delivered-To: 123535-done@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no
version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level:
X-CrossAssassin-Score: 5
Hello,
This bug is being closed because of its age and the vanishingly small
chance that it is still relevant to the current KDE packages, as it was
clearly since fixed, a random unreproducible bug that never had enough of
a follow-up to be useful, or else was forwarded upstream, where it was
marked fixed some time ago.
In case I'm mistaken, please do re-open the bug report in question, and
explain how the report is still relevant.
Thanks,
Christopher Martin
Reply to: