Bug#116585: marked as done (konqueror settings: searching for cookies)
Your message dated Sun, 16 Jan 2005 21:03:18 -0500
with message-id <200501162103.24654.christopher.martin@utoronto.ca>
and subject line Bug no longer relevant, so closing
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at maintonly) by bugs.debian.org; 21 Oct 2001 22:36:11 +0000
>From mgedmin@delfi.lt Sun Oct 21 17:36:11 2001
Return-path: <mgedmin@delfi.lt>
Received: from adsl-212-59-30-243.takas.lt (gintaras.vetrunge.lt.eu.org) [212.59.30.243]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 15vRCV-00008Y-00; Sun, 21 Oct 2001 17:36:11 -0500
Received: by gintaras.vetrunge.lt.eu.org (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id 837C827865; Mon, 22 Oct 2001 00:36:08 +0200 (EET)
Date: Mon, 22 Oct 2001 00:36:08 +0200
From: Marius Gedminas <mgedmin@delfi.lt>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <maintonly@bugs.debian.org>
Subject: konqueror settings: searching for cookies
Message-ID: <20011022003608.A11785@gintaras>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.23i
X-Reportbug-Version: 1.31
X-URL: http://ice.dammit.lt/~mgedmin/
Delivered-To: maintonly@bugs.debian.org
Package: konqueror
Version: 4:2.2.1.0-4
Severity: wishlist
When there are too many domain specific cookie policies, it becomes hard
to find a domain. It could be www.host.com, host.com or .host.com, so
alphabetic sorting doesn't help much.
A Find button would be nice for selecting substrings in domain names.
This could apply to other domain specific lists, but this inconvenience
is greater for cookies since the list gets very large when you have
(*) Ask for confirmation before accepting cookies.
-- System Information
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux mg 2.4.12 #1 Thu Oct 18 18:45:10 EET 2001 i686
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=lt_LT
Versions of packages konqueror depends on:
ii debconf 1.0.15 Debian configuration management sy
ii kdebase-libs 4:2.2.1.0-4 KDE libraries and modules for kdeb
ii kdelibs3 4:2.2.1-12 KDE core libraries (runtime files)
ii lesstif1 1:0.93.12-2 OSF/Motif implementation released
ii libarts 4:2.2.1-12 aRts Sound system
ii libc6 2.2.4-3 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
ii libjpeg62 6b-1.3 The Independent JPEG Group's JPEG
ii libkonq3 4:2.2.1.0-4 Core libraries for KDE's file mana
ii libpng2 1.0.12-2 PNG library - runtime
ii libqt2 2:2.3.1-13 Qt GUI Library (runtime version).
ii libstdc++2.10-glibc2.2 1:2.95.4-0.011006 The GNU stdc++ library
ii xlibs 4.1.0-8 X Window System client libraries
ii zlib1g 1:1.1.3-16 compression library - runtime
Marius Gedminas
--
Place mark here ->[ ]<- if you want a dirty monitor.
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 116585-done) by bugs.debian.org; 17 Jan 2005 02:03:31 +0000
>From christopher.martin@utoronto.ca Sun Jan 16 18:03:31 2005
Return-path: <christopher.martin@utoronto.ca>
Received: from tomts25-srv.bellnexxia.net [209.226.175.188]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1CqMEo-0002G9-00; Sun, 16 Jan 2005 18:03:26 -0800
Received: from [192.168.0.100] ([70.49.17.55])
by tomts25-srv.bellnexxia.net
(InterMail vM.5.01.06.10 201-253-122-130-110-20040306) with ESMTP
id <20050117020322.SUTX25979.tomts25-srv.bellnexxia.net@[192.168.0.100]>;
Sun, 16 Jan 2005 21:03:22 -0500
From: Christopher Martin <christopher.martin@utoronto.ca>
Reply-To: Christopher Martin <christopher.martin@utoronto.ca>
To: 89622-done@bugs.debian.org,
107756-done@bugs.debian.org,
116585-done@bugs.debian.org,
121344-done@bugs.debian.org,
121933-done@bugs.debian.org,
123535-done@bugs.debian.org,
131545-done@bugs.debian.org,
145376-done@bugs.debian.org,
156949-done@bugs.debian.org,
193124-done@bugs.debian.org,
201189-done@bugs.debian.org,
203709-done@bugs.debian.org,
219906-done@bugs.debian.org,
237042-done@bugs.debian.org,
243956-done@bugs.debian.org,
253700-done@bugs.debian.org,
180352-done@bugs.debian.org,
194398-done@bugs.debian.org,
196679-done@bugs.debian.org,
196723-done@bugs.debian.org,
197369-done@bugs.debian.org,
197425-done@bugs.debian.org,
198152-done@bugs.debian.org,
198306-done@bugs.debian.org,
200314-done@bugs.debian.org,
202685-done@bugs.debian.org,
205009-done@bugs.debian.org,
207556-done@bugs.debian.org,
209305-done@bugs.debian.org,
211542-done@bugs.debian.org,
212925-done@bugs.debian.org,
216073-done@bugs.debian.org,
216929-done@bugs.debian.org,
217300-done@bugs.debian.org,
217717-done@bugs.debian.org,
222662-done@bugs.debian.org,
227199-done@bugs.debian.org,
231688-done@bugs.debian.org,
232501-done@bugs.debian.org,
234111-done@bugs.debian.org,
234656-done@bugs.debian.org,
238813-done@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Bug no longer relevant, so closing
Date: Sun, 16 Jan 2005 21:03:18 -0500
User-Agent: KMail/1.7.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-Id: <200501162103.24654.christopher.martin@utoronto.ca>
Delivered-To: 116585-done@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no
version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level:
X-CrossAssassin-Score: 2
Hello,
This bug is being closed because of its age and the vanishingly small
chance that it is still relevant to the current KDE packages, as it was
clearly since fixed, a random unreproducible bug that never had enough of
a follow-up to be useful, or else was forwarded upstream, where it was
marked fixed some time ago.
In case I'm mistaken, please do re-open the bug report in question, and
explain how the report is still relevant.
Thanks,
Christopher Martin
Reply to: